Rakii
Captain
Karma: +38/-19
Offline
Posts: 291
Clitz Lickerz Clubz
|
|
« on: November 13, 2007, 13:34:47 PM » |
|
to maintain my low point strategy , what do you suggest as my maximum population on my surrounding provinces before i have my level 7 fort?
|
|
|
Logged
|
Bankai
|
|
|
k_mihai
Guest
|
|
« Reply #1 on: November 13, 2007, 14:08:47 PM » |
|
is in the strategy. i played with it last era in r7
u need 5 provinces, the 2nd one being the boxed mountain, or mountain with forest. all ur other provinces should have capped the population around 20 k villagers. their function is to give u the walled province advantage (-20 morale for the attacker), recruiting grounds for units, but they are not ur economy. Ur economy are ur neighbors, and the mountain provinces (after u got the lv 7 fort, mostly)
uneed to have big depots, maximum 4 k networth and to farm ur neighbors until u reach the 4 + millions GE necessary for a lv 7 fort.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Rakii
Captain
Karma: +38/-19
Offline
Posts: 291
Clitz Lickerz Clubz
|
|
« Reply #2 on: November 13, 2007, 14:54:12 PM » |
|
im trying to do this strategy now in realm 2, i already have my second province with archers inside with less than 100 points. its great.
About my question, you know that putting high level of farm makes your points level up too. Thats why im asking, I can make so much population after i reach my level 7 fort, but i want to prove if i really can make level 7 fort with less than 10k. (im trying to make this happen in shorter time unlike you have stated)
Im following all the instruction above including the armies and researches.
|
|
|
Logged
|
Bankai
|
|
|
k_mihai
Guest
|
|
« Reply #3 on: November 13, 2007, 15:06:30 PM » |
|
stop ur farms at level 9, in all provinces, except the mountain boxed one. otherwise, u will grow too much, and lose the low point protection. that`s true also for granaries.
the logic of growth in IO now is population dependent, which means, the more people u have, the more u will grow. that`s why, in low point, who is an anti-growth strategy, population needs to be limited.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Rakii
Captain
Karma: +38/-19
Offline
Posts: 291
Clitz Lickerz Clubz
|
|
« Reply #4 on: November 13, 2007, 15:27:13 PM » |
|
tnx for the reply.
|
|
|
Logged
|
Bankai
|
|
|
k_mihai
Guest
|
|
« Reply #5 on: November 13, 2007, 15:28:15 PM » |
|
u`re welcome
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Ruskiy
Private
Karma: +3/-4
Offline
Posts: 32
|
|
« Reply #6 on: January 07, 2008, 08:28:32 AM » |
|
Realm 25: if centrelization cost is increased to 30k wood, 2k iron, 20k stone, and 58k gold is this strategy useless? or can it be modified?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Polymeron
Captain
Karma: +98/-103
Offline
Posts: 304
Be the Storm
|
|
« Reply #7 on: January 07, 2008, 12:04:21 PM » |
|
That's a good question... I know that in GI the defenses are still good enough to warrant it, but I think the (initial) higher costs of Centralization break a lot of the merit of this strategy
|
|
|
Logged
|
Respect GW, or we'll see how good your AA is.
|
|
|
k_mihai
Guest
|
|
« Reply #8 on: January 07, 2008, 12:10:11 PM » |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Rabain
Sergeant
Karma: +0/-3
Offline
Posts: 61
|
|
« Reply #9 on: January 08, 2008, 04:13:50 AM » |
|
What are good ways to reduce points at little cost...apart from disbanding troops?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Radooo
|
|
« Reply #10 on: January 08, 2008, 14:24:19 PM » |
|
You can only reduce points by disbanding troops
|
|
|
Logged
|
I am the one and only!
|
|
|
|
Rabain
Sergeant
Karma: +0/-3
Offline
Posts: 61
|
|
« Reply #12 on: January 08, 2008, 15:08:35 PM » |
|
Gah...I'm not quite ready to hit that 15000 watershed just yet.
Oh well...no choice now.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
bolin
YoUr MoThEr!
Sergeant
Karma: +7/-11
Offline
Posts: 82
|
|
« Reply #13 on: January 20, 2008, 00:22:40 AM » |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
DaMoGLiMaN, MaTaNdOlOs
|
|
|
Foundation
Guest
|
|
« Reply #14 on: January 20, 2008, 03:24:41 AM » |
|
But you had to have had low points & a high fort or ppl would have taken that, right?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|