Alliance ranking

[Hiske]

OMG.... there is really going to be a new alliance-ranking-system??? I almost cannot believe it!!! that makes me soooooooo happy!!! tell us more, please!!!

 

[k_mihai]

i think that the version 4 rankings is not very good, but fortunately i don`t play in this realms but i`m also curious, on how the military based rankings will work

[Radooo]

And it will be implemented in the middle of eras?
And I guess it will be like the first alliance ranking, so still a bad one

[iferna1]

shame we couldnt do something like this
4 parts
1 military points
2 honor
3 differential
4 timeframe                                                                           
1x1 = 1 2x1 = .75 3x1 = .50 4x1 = .25   
month 1 x 4 month 2 x 3 month 3 x 2  month 4 x 1
honor = 1x = 1 2x =1.25 3x =1.5 4x = 2.0 ( LESS = X 1 )

alliance a = 200,000 TP                ]
alliance b = 100,000 TP__________]  diferential
month 2                    __________]  timeframe
A = 500 MP                                ]
B = 200 MP                __________]  military points
A = 16 H                                   ]
B = 7 H                     __________]  honor

A = 500 (MP) X 1.25(H) = 625
B = 200 (MP) X 1 (H)  = 200

A = 625 X .75  = 312.5
B = 200

A = 312.5 X 3 937.5
B = 200 X 3 = 600.0

in month 2 of era alliance a declares vs alliance b . alliance a has 200k  total points
alliance b had 100k total points . in 7 days alliance a scores 500 military points and 16 honor in war , alliance b scores 200 military points and 7 honor . alliance a scores 2 times the honor than alliance b so x 1.25  , alliance a has 2 x total points than alliance b  so x .75 , month 2 so tallied points for both are x 3

[Machucado]

Shame we have to live with this...

 SMESHNICI     BG_ARMS    11   4   2008-03-26 14:04:36   2008-04-02 14:04:36

BG_ARMS declare, and score a total of 4 points... 

shame we couldnt do something like this
4 parts
1 military points
2 honor
3 differential
4 timeframe                                                                           

Any alliance system based on military points will just mean that fake wars will have too much bearing on the alliance ranking.

I like the idea about a ranking based on honour (even if it would mean more light soldiers, at least it would be fair). 

[Radooo]

Any alliance system based on military points will just mean that fake wars will have too much bearing on the alliance ranking.

I like the idea about a ranking based on honour (even if it would mean more light soldiers, at least it would be fair). 

Pushing honor in a war? If you find someone with some archers you can attack him just to take some honor

[Machucado]

Pushing honor in a war? If you find someone with some archers you can attack him just to take some honor

As long as it's for losing your own soldiers you get alliance points for, I don't care 

I still prefer counting net worth lost in war battles to determine the alliance ranking points, but I'll settle for honour (honor).

[Radooo]

But think about fake wars with honor. It is so hard to push some honor?

[Machucado]

But think about fake wars with honor. It is so hard to push some honor?

No, but it is limited to the amount of soldiers you have. Once you are out of soldiers you can't make more alliance ranking points.

With alliance systems based on military points, alliance ranking points is limited to the amount of multiaccounts and friends you have in the last week. If both alliances get points (100 % and 50 % that was suggested some time ago) it will be even better for fake wars... the losing alliance will GAIN alliance ranking points....

[Radooo]

No, but it is limited to the amount of soldiers you have. Once you are out of soldiers you can't make more alliance ranking points.

With alliance systems based on military points, alliance ranking points is limited to the amount of multiaccounts and friends you have in the last week. If both alliances get points (100 % and 50 % that was suggested some time ago) it will be even better for fake wars... the losing alliance will GAIN alliance ranking points....

I didn't say that system was the best
But, I may win 1000 millitary points without taking honor and someone can suicide 200 spearmen to give the defender 2 honor

[Machucado]

I didn't say that system was the best
But, I may win 1000 millitary points without taking honor and someone can suicide 200 spearmen to give the defender 2 honor

You're right about that  Let's just settle for net worth loss then  ?

[iferna1]

in what i wrote , honor is a modifier only , miltary points is still the basis for counting war points . same as differential and timeframe , all modifiers of the total war points for win

[Machucado]

in what i wrote , honor is a modifier only , miltary points is still the basis for counting war points . same as differential and timeframe , all modifiers of the total war points for win

Based on the number of fake battles to make fake marshalls the last week of every era and on fake alliance wars in general, the alliance with most friends and multiaccounts that smash their armies into them will win the alliance race.

[Darkcelt00]

I think AXTJ is the best allience

[KoSaC]

I think AXTJ is the best allience

nope,you must be a bit confused...PREDATORS is the best alliance