Alliance ranking

[soy_julian]

if EFA´s bad, then the wars only should be between alliance with exactly the same points, or something like that (that´s not exactly the solution, obviously), i don´t know....but when an allliance, with huge army, declares war to another with a lot of difference (pay accounts vs. no pay accounts for example), the one way that the smallest can make something like "give trouble" is with EFA´s......it could be part of the tactic, pretty or not...

[carman]

im not understanding if an alliance beats you per say by 3000 points you get 2 points for every 1000 you beat them by so you get 6 extra points for a harder fought battle. then makes everyone fight harder for the bonuses and less for fake because fake wars dont net as much as fought ones

[Hiske]

im not understanding if an alliance beats you per say by 3000 points you get 2 points for every 1000 you beat them by so you get 6 extra points for a harder fought battle. then makes everyone fight harder for the bonuses and less for fake because fake wars dont net as much as fought ones

it's usually not the difference that determines a hard war... I mean; if an alliance wins with 10.000-100; it's usually not a hard war! if an alliance wins with 10.000-9500 it seems much more like a hard war

[Machucado]

It's kind of pointless discussing this amongst ourselves. We have done it several times and it has lead to nothing. We all have different ideas, good or bad, but until we know what Admins really want with the alliance ranking system, there is no use in discussing it.

Admins aren't discussing the issue with the users, so I suppose they will just go ahead with Stasy's proposal.

[vaidocius]

i suggest that military points gained in war should  have influence for points in alliance rankings ...
100mp-1p in rankings 500mp-2p and maximum of points 12 you ca get in war 12p

[makavelis]

i suggest that military points gained in war should  have influence for points in alliance rankings ...
100mp-1p in rankings 500mp-2p and maximum of points 12 you ca get in war 12p

this will make wars in first months useless 

[vaidocius]

i never had intresting war in the begining but wars will be more intresting....  fight fake war wont be no profit
and i dont think that will be some system whitch could fit for all era

[Radooo]

Yes it is possible to fit for all era (I don't know if it's easy to implement). And wars in the beginning are harder than wars in the end this is sure

[soy_julian]

or maybe divide in parts the era, so the suggestion of vaidocius could be impllement at "the end or the middle" of the era?

[soy_julian]

but fake wars not always are "fake"....sometimes is a big big alliance that attacks a small and the small surrender for "survive"....others don´t surrender.....  ...and that´s ok, why it couldn´t be?

[stud]

but fake wars not always are "fake"....sometimes is a big big alliance that attacks a small and the small surrender for "survive"....others don´t surrender.....  ...and that´s ok, why it couldn´t be?

my alliance in r10 is attacked by much stronger alliance, but we'll never surrender, we'll fight them to the last minute 11 hours to go, and we're leading by 193

[soy_julian]

yeah...my alliance too...a big one pay account alliance ask us for surrender.. before they even declare the war!!!! ...we not only don´t surrender...we made them saw that they will not won at all ....and they don´t declare the war!!!  
 

[vaidocius]

for surendering should be some points given exemple: surendering for stronger 2x give 4 points 3x 3 points 4x 2 points ...... stronger alliance cant get much military points for destroing empty forts or hunting weak armys

[5tormlord]

Umm, how about letting the leader decide what ranks to give to the other alliance members? with no voting.
And lots of ranks too, not just Ally, Advisor , and leader... (bit boring)   
Umm, how about having the in-alliance ranks the same as Military Ranks?
Or, these ranks, -->  in order of amount of days spent in alliance (or the leaders disision)

Recruit . 1-5 days
Corporal . 6-11 days
Sergeant . 12-17 days
Lieutenant . 18-23 days
Captain . 24-29 days
General . 30+ days.

Leading off this, the leader bonus thingy, maybe..a bonus production could be given due to what rank you are. Like:

Recruit . 1% bonus
Corporal . 2% bonus
Sergeant . 4% bonus
Lieutenant . 6% bonus
Captain . 10% bonus
General . 14% bonus
Leader . 15% bonus

And i understand that this IS a very large bonus - but i think its what this game should have, to liven it up a little.
Also, there are alot of people that make alliances just for the +10 morale, with this i  think that shouldnt be aloud until the alliance is active, or has atleast 8 players or something like that.

AND, (last one i promise)  Alliance Wars :  Maybe if you successfully SEIGE a player with a higher alliance rank, you can earn bonus war points. Like 1 bonus point for recruit. 2 bonus pointsfor Corparal. 3 for Sergeant and so on. YAY 

[beicumine]

so many ideeas and so many problems  (almost same all time )

Look peoples i realised in wars it will be good if sistem dont allow to lider of alliance declare war to an alliance of +:- 50 procent of net worth points: ex my alliance have 2mil net worth points so i will be able to fight with alliances with ntwp(net worth..)of min 1 mil or 3 mil that would be a great procentage....in this way it will be much difficult making wars  on band as we did in realm 5 or any others....so peoples will be more carefully when they do that and to who m....also small alliances will be protected and have some time to develope and enjoy the game....about wars reward and strategy i am still thinking ....

Kind regards to all !!!

Cip Leader of Alcool (realm 5)