What's the best army composition

[kingjohn]

As in paladins, phalanx and archers and assuming I am not getting guardians. And if I get guardians what is the best ration. My army ratio r2 is current 2 phalanx : 1 paladins and just few guardians.

[Radooo]

Without guardians you can be masacrated

[Spiridon]

Without guardians you can be masacrated

Wrong!   

[nasio]

Wrong!   

totally right spiridon,,cz maybe only spearmans ,phalanx,,elite archers and paladins enough to smash a big army

[mjez]

so making guardians is useless? 

[Spiridon]

so making guardians is useless? 

Wrong! 

[Radooo]

An army with only few guardians is very weak

[mjez]

so why not make guardians? 

[Spiridon]

totally right spiridon,,cz maybe only spearmans ,phalanx,,elite archers and paladins enough to smash a big army

I see you are learning fast from others accidents.  But everything depends on opponents army, attacked province kind, starting morale, researches, siege weapons, distance, weather, holidays, server crashes, known and unknown bugs, net speed and reliability, who is more sleepy, moon phases, how angry is your wife/husband/boyfriend/girlfriend etc on you about playing.  I think I forgot something. 

[Radooo]

If you attack a weak army, than you don't need guardians ...but if you attack an army made with same amount of money better balanced, you'll lose quickly

[Spiridon]

so why not make guardians? 

The best army is to have plenty of everything.  It depends on how you intend to use your army. There is no such thing as "best army composition" in general.

[Spiridon]

If you attack a weak army, than you don't need guardians ...but if you attack an army made with same amount of money better balanced, you'll lose quickly

Very wrong! 

[Radooo]

Very wrong! 

You're wrong

[Spiridon]

You're wrong

Ok, I have my proofs, so let me be wrong! 

[mjez]

i'll be wrong too for everyone