Imperia Online International
March 28, 2024, 12:47:16 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register  
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Poor siege of the fortress  (Read 2353 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
acakeba
Private
*

Karma: +0/-1
Offline Offline

Posts: 6


« on: June 11, 2014, 10:45:29 AM »

Moderators from my country say that all is well with the battle.

World FB2 x4
Username is acakeba

Battle: [battleRep = 74067] acakeba against corleone12yunus [/ battleRep]
Full report: http://prntscr.com/3r4om1
Battle of the field: http://prntscr.com/3r4nsl
The siege of the fortress: http://prntscr.com/3r4obq
Generals http://prntscr.com/3r4ots

Please explain to me why I lost this battle. I think I damaged due to errors.
Thank you for your response in advance.
Logged
Madzoism
Global Moderator
*

Karma: +78/-21
Offline Offline

Posts: 644



« Reply #1 on: June 11, 2014, 10:58:32 AM »

Hi, as i can see you destroyed the fortress walls but you lost the battle against the garrison. The battle has no errors.
Logged
acakeba
Private
*

Karma: +0/-1
Offline Offline

Posts: 6


« Reply #2 on: June 11, 2014, 12:08:21 PM »

How could I lose the garrison when I was three times bigger army?
Are you blind or what (no offense).
Logged
Dint
Trusted Member
*

Karma: +135/-6
Offline Offline

Posts: 413



WWW
« Reply #3 on: June 11, 2014, 12:20:25 PM »

How could I lose the garrison when I was three times bigger army?
The size of an army doesn't determine its strength, it's all about finding the right balance. The first line of your army (~9100 cavalry units at that moment) fled from the battle in round 10, after their morale went down to 44. The remaining army was no match for the enemy garrison army and was pretty much slaughtered. So everything b_mad said is correct.

Are you blind or what (no offense).
And please watch your attitude, especially since you're the one asking questions here and we're trying to help you by answering them. Saying "no offense" doesn't make your remark more acceptable. *hmm*
« Last Edit: June 11, 2014, 12:47:00 PM by Dint » Logged
acakeba
Private
*

Karma: +0/-1
Offline Offline

Posts: 6


« Reply #4 on: June 11, 2014, 13:36:23 PM »

Thank you for your response.
I did not want to sound harsh, I just thought that I obviously right.

I see 10 rounds fled from the field, but I do not see that morale was 44.
Maybe visualization is not good but I see 10 rounds morale 77?
« Last Edit: June 11, 2014, 13:39:23 PM by acakeba » Logged
Dint
Trusted Member
*

Karma: +135/-6
Offline Offline

Posts: 413



WWW
« Reply #5 on: June 11, 2014, 13:47:26 PM »

I see 10 rounds fled from the field, but I do not see that morale was 44.
Maybe visualization is not good but I see 10 rounds morale 77?

There's a known bug concerning the visualization of the morale indeed. The morale of 77 you see is the average morale of all three lines.

This was the actual morale of the 3 lines at the beginning of round 10:
Line 1: 51 (Loses 7 morale and flees)
Line 2: 102 (Loses 1 morale)
Line 3: 78 (Loses 4 morale)
Logged
acakeba
Private
*

Karma: +0/-1
Offline Offline

Posts: 6


« Reply #6 on: June 11, 2014, 13:53:19 PM »

So, I need more Arrow and swords. Am I right?
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.12 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!