imperian VS nomads

[lucky38]

the difference between the two races is huge .....


nomads have it easy , they can build army at a drop of a hat .... building 2000 at a time in one province ..compared to the imperians building 1000 at a push as the cost of adding a measly 50 capacity to recruiting  is huge

of course the above can be deemed as realistic ( not the recruiting capacity..maybe adding a tech 'conscript' to imperians   )

what is not realistic  is the fortress capacity's..... imperians should be more technologically advance and fortresses should reflect this 

also there should be a CAP on nomads research compared to imperians ..after all these NOMADS live in  MUD huts or caves

there's not really much of an advantage  being imperian , of course the attack of paladins is greater  BY 45 but nomads just need an extra 20k elite horse than they to win ( which is cheaper and easy for them to recruit ) ...  in every other scenario  nomads come out of top

there's to many advantages to be nomad to list , literately the whole game is rigged in there favor ...

army upkeep ( i feel that is realistic though )

recruiting     ( again i feel it is realistic )

TECH  ( i DO NOT FEEL THIS IS REALISTIC ...imperian amour should have a greater cap 25 to include alliance , attack should also be greater as well a range   )

imperian siege should be EVEN GREATER than it is

nomads Universities should be capped  at 10 .. who ever heard of intelligent NOMAD they live in tents , caves and mud huts ..and rape and pillage

population : there should be some kind of bonus for imperian as it has to build houses

there must be some MORE advantages to being imperian

[Macedon11]

In this case Nomads are not barbarian they are super force it would be much easier if they change the name of the game to Nomads Online so the imperian could be intruder (less advantage in everything).