I do not think you understand one thing - 1 war, 2 pillages per province and an imperian if he wants to have as much people as he had before pillage he needs 2,5 - 3 weeks ... a nomad - less then a week. This happens when you have 200.000 people per province ... by the way if you want to have 300.000 people in a province you need medicine lvl 20, 32 lvl's of houses and farms lvl 13 ... 9th lvl costs sth about 2mln of ressources, 10th - 4 mln, 11th - 8mln, 12 - 16 mln, 13 - 32 mln ... spedning 32mln of ress to gain 20k population more? If a nomad pillages such a province with 300.000 people he will kill 85.000 people (sanctuaries included) and your population growth will fall down to 350/h ... in such case you will need more than 10 days just to have 300.000 population again ... afrer war and 2 pillages - maybe 20 days ...
I assure you a player like Forest will pillage you to the the last man in province when he finds out that you are in x2 with 300.000 people ... and I suppose that he can do it with 1/3 or 1/4 of his army. You can do nothing against that. Even if you pillage him he will have 200.000 people two days later
This will happen later on ... what else? Pillaging is profitable for nomads
An imperian therefore will never out grow a nomad.
Ironic ... if you have Fortress lvl 7 there is a cementary building even if you have not been pillaged
1/3 - 1/4 of all imperians from TOP 120 are playing in one alliance, me too ... if nothing changes we will quit at the end of this year. Why? Because we have enough. It is too much for our nerves, costs too much time and money just to prove that we have right and something needs to be changed as quickly as possible. Imperians are too week: have worse economy, worse income, are worse in military. We checked it the hard way - won 3 wars and lost only once
Next examples?
I'm sorry but i think you are one sighted.
I must say that you are right (partly) in what you are saying but there is ALWAYS another side of coin.
As nomad IM SCARED imperials would very soon start blowing me away with no troubles. I did some calculations and i tried to predict what would happen so i can do good "strategic" decisions but I can't see bright future for nomads.
The moment you get elite units we are doomed. Your fort is MUCH stronger than our fort, your army is stronger than our army, your trebs are stronger than our trebs
So YES i have to compensate with larger number of units. Now think a second. DO YOU REALLY think we can pay army upkeep to match your army. For example, right now i'm walking on tin line. I can build army VERY FAST but in the same manner VERY FAST i would not be able to pay army upkeep. So we would start selling resources and prices would go even lower than now.
As it is now, i don't even try to attack Imperian with F7 unless he is ultimate noob and don't set his army properly.
As this game advance ALL I CAN SEE is imperian would start to dominate more and more. Why the hell you need 300k population? Isn't 250k in every province more than enough to have much better economy than nomads.
Why are you so afraid of pillage??? You have guardians, you have phalanx, you have MIGHTY archers and Trebs PLUS stronger paladins than our cavalry.
So add to that calculation province bonus you would have and nomad would have to send something like 2x stronger army to brake you and pillage.
I'm sure you are experienced player but i strongly believe you are making big mistake by thinking nomads are better and that nomads would rule the realm in few months.
I really do hope i'm wrong because i would hate to run from Imperians but as i can see it what almost all nomads would be able to do later in the game is pillage. In V4a i NEVER care if somebody pillage me. By the time big wars start i have damn strong army and i make my economy works in such a way that i DON'T feel pillage.