yeah... well....still i don't understand what bothers you about my nickname and i sincerly don't give a .....
but i think you're just plain stupid and didn't understand what the topic is all about.... i don't want those things i asked about to be changed.... i just want to make the peeople in IO management that we arn't idiots and they shouldn't feed us crap like "we-re removeing some featurese because we're trying to make the game more realistic"
the game will never be realistic because is jsut a game....
and you'll never make something realistic by making it featureless
and please..... don't be a dumb redneck and judge or say anithing about someone elses name or nickname coz francly.... reni sounds g_y... i'd beat my parrents if they'd named me that
dude... you have difficulties getting irony...
Looking that you still didn't understood why i mentioned your nickname, i'm explaining it to you in a fair way. Your nickname is your choice. You name yourself with that, and you does not need to have an explanation at all. The others call you with your nickname and they never ask you why you choose that or to give explanation about. What i did to you, is the same with what you did with game owners (creators). You asked for reasons that don't exist (or at least explanation don't exist) or for future improvements that can't be completed without creating mess somewhere else.
I understand pretty well what you want to say. And i'm saying that there is no logic behind that. A game can't be real life, because we'll not call it a game any more. Number of features has nothing to do with entertainment. If you have doubts, look at chess for example.
Look at your improvements:
why after a siege a fortress and the building within it are not destroyed?
Firstly why they should? Secondly, this will make army save not possible anymore.
and if it's not repaired and it's attacked again it doesn't suffer any more damage
Of course is better like it is. If the fortress effect will be removed after it is destroyed, then it will be possible prosecute someone to death.
why is it a rule that a horseman doesnt survive after a battle?
Why not? The rule is like this. If you want a stupid explanation i can give you one: The horseman can't walk without his horse and he want to come back, but he dies during the trip.
why after a pillage the villagers don't go back to work?
because they are lazy...
Do you want for explanation? Ok, because they are afraid from the attacker. Only when you go there, and tell them to come back and work again, they believe you as a governor.
if i attack with and army of 10 000 guardians and 100 trebuchetes.....( you need 10000 men to handle 100 trebuchetes) the guardians handle the siege weapons or fight the defending army?... and if the fight the defending army who handles the siege weapons?.... and don;t give me that ..... that the siege weapons are handled by the 75 villagers used to uild it coz then you wouldn't have to bring 100 guardians for each trebuchete
This rule is good, because you should not have the possibility to send 1000 soldiers and 25k sieges minimizing your looses. The opposite is also bad, because will ask you to have a huge army just to take a mere fortress.
Explanation?
The soldiers are needed to help during the transport. To fight they don't need them, because those 75 peasants are already trained for that function. But those 75 peasants can't transport a trebuche alone...
why do i need wood to hire swordsmen and horsemen? (well... the horsemen need spears but i don't think the need that much wood)
How do you know how much wood is needed? Are you just looking in other games... and you think they are realistic?
why if i attack a boxed in province i lose only morale and not army to?... do the villagers in the province i just pass throu make fun of my army and so i lose morale?
)
Was properly this question who gave me the idea to ask you about your nickname. The question is totally senseless. The game owners choose this way to give you the possibility to defend. You are asking, why is like this... what to say... Do you want me to ask you again you you choose your nickname again?
why if i siege a defensles province..... there's only one man putting up a fight?... in 200 000 villagers....if you can call them villagers when they are 200k.... there's only one man?.... the rest are wemen?... and so do you really think that the men ...wich are all soldiers... would have sex with a woman that worked all her life in a stone quary?... or a iron mine?
).... or the medicine is just a cover for human cloning
)... or in-vitro insemination...
This is another senseless question. Game designers decided this and the right answer to your question is again like the previous one.
Anyway, if you want an explanation, let's say that population does not have weapons and they are not even inside fortress where only the army and treasury can stay...
P.S.
You should try not to offend when you don't understand something, because is not fair... 
