Imperia Online International

IO - Classic and Version 4 Realms => General Talk => Topic started by: Krum on September 15, 2007, 19:13:24 PM



Title: In the name of the record
Post by: Krum on September 15, 2007, 19:13:24 PM
Fight@realm 10

2565 honor
130 851 military points
4 164 262 enemy troops slaughtered

these are best results ever achieved


(http://img90.imageshack.us/img90/6876/doblestfr7.jpg)
(http://img363.imageshack.us/img363/9395/statsci2.jpg)


And one humble record-wannabe from me :-[ - 33 round siege battle
http://statika.imperiaonline.org/imperia/game/_addons/dokladi/?path=bitki/5/2007_9_7/3201295_3169671_619660 (http://statika.imperiaonline.org/imperia/game/_addons/dokladi/?path=bitki/5/2007_9_7/3201295_3169671_619660)


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: belgarion on September 15, 2007, 19:32:43 PM
damn i hope you paid them over time after the 10th round  *hahaha*


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: Reaccão on September 15, 2007, 23:35:12 PM



And one humble record-wannabe from me :-[ - 33 round siege battle
http://statika.imperiaonline.org/imperia/game/_addons/dokladi/?path=bitki/5/2007_9_7/3201295_3169671_619660 (http://statika.imperiaonline.org/imperia/game/_addons/dokladi/?path=bitki/5/2007_9_7/3201295_3169671_619660)

This one is 37 rounds, but I think Iraklis (Horia pressing the buttons) had one with 43. All I know for sure I wasn't the record holder in Reacro with 37.

rounds.http://www3.imperiaonline.org/imperia/game/bitki/5/2007_6_1/3000127_3069298_325050_en.txt


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: codegrrrl on September 21, 2007, 22:09:57 PM
I had thought I didn't screenshot my empire at the end of R10 Era 2, but lookie lookie what I found.  Now if I just had my point total...

What few may know is that the tool carried by the devil *evil* was actually to tend to his farms (and beat his slaves).. and...
 he was a woman!  *kissgirl*
(http://www.codegrrrl.com/imperia/screens/r10e2_finalproduction.jpg)




Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: Lord Rogue on September 30, 2007, 03:11:11 AM
ok... going for old records... R4E1 (note the date *hihi* ). I am pretty sure that this is the first intentional, successful Kamikaze seen in R4E1, and a mighty Kamikaze it has been... I wish I could find the follow-up's battle report but even getting this was such a nightmare...

on the 7th of July, 2006, a battle was fought. Osmangazi (~Orpheya~) attacked Zimzum (Mordor) in his boxed level 7 in mountains province.
http://www2.imperiaonline.org/imperia/game/bitki/4/2006_7_7/2000056_2000301_200883_en.txt


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: Rake on October 15, 2007, 12:58:48 PM
one little detail, the draw on battle report, the guys on foot, on the center/left side, have grass up to there ass, but the horse on the right, seem to run over ste grass... kinda frean, no???


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: ___justus_ on November 02, 2007, 17:06:51 PM
high level military recearchs

(http://img462.imageshack.us/img462/5273/capturedep7.jpg)


(http://img340.imageshack.us/img340/4308/capturedfc1.jpg)


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: Alp_Arslan2 on November 04, 2007, 08:46:21 AM
what a waste!  *crazy* *crazy* *crazy*
Didn't you have anything else to spend all that iron on???  *crazy* *crazy* *crazy*
Didn't anyone ever tell you that building up melee, armor, etc., after elite level does not have much effect!
 *xxx*


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: ___justus_ on November 04, 2007, 09:04:09 AM
I am playing long game (8 months)...here 14 armor necessary for paladin...


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: Leila on November 10, 2007, 10:58:51 AM
Hey justus, good job  *bravo*


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: ___justus_ on November 10, 2007, 16:48:41 PM
     FOR LONG REALMS...   

(http://img253.imageshack.us/img253/9045/capturedus4.jpg)

     (http://img106.imageshack.us/img106/7823/capturedsk5.jpg)

    (http://img48.imageshack.us/img48/4797/captureddy3.jpg)

                        (http://img225.imageshack.us/img225/4982/capturedfr0.jpg)


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: k_mihai on November 10, 2007, 17:52:11 PM
i think u didn`t met king john, who will kill all of us with 34 th level granaries in 4 months realms :D


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: BeaZtiE on November 10, 2007, 23:48:37 PM
     FOR LONG REALMS...   

(http://img253.imageshack.us/img253/9045/capturedus4.jpg)

     (http://img106.imageshack.us/img106/7823/capturedsk5.jpg)

    (http://img48.imageshack.us/img48/4797/captureddy3.jpg)

                        (http://img225.imageshack.us/img225/4982/capturedfr0.jpg)

just another farmer...


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: kingjohn on November 13, 2007, 15:12:22 PM
i think u didn`t met king john, who will kill all of us with 34 th level granaries in 4 months realms :D

You are right, he hasn't meet me yet.

http://img141.imageshack.us/my.php?image=buildingsow8.jpg

http://img525.imageshack.us/my.php?image=researchwb3.jpg


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: kingjohn on November 13, 2007, 15:32:25 PM
i think u didn`t met king john, who will kill all of us with 34 th level granaries in 4 months realms :D

Even my depots are huge, I love to stack up tons of resources to invite people to visit me. And one click of a button where did the resources go?? My attacker would cry!!  *cry* *cry* *cry*


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: BeaZtiE on November 13, 2007, 19:14:50 PM
KingJohn.. why you when was closed to me cant do this developments and buildings?  *sos* *sos*


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: k_mihai on November 13, 2007, 22:27:38 PM
now, he said he`s a warrior

but don`t tell anyone, is a secret


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: ___justus_ on November 14, 2007, 00:48:07 AM
     FOR LONG REALMS...   

(http://img253.imageshack.us/img253/9045/capturedus4.jpg)

     (http://img106.imageshack.us/img106/7823/capturedsk5.jpg)

    (http://img48.imageshack.us/img48/4797/captureddy3.jpg)

                        (http://img225.imageshack.us/img225/4982/capturedfr0.jpg)

this is record for LONG REALMS...here buying the province is difficult and the evolution is very slow...
this record for long realm and i think it is not go beyond...


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: kingjohn on November 14, 2007, 02:28:26 AM
KingJohn.. why you when was closed to me cant do this developments and buildings?  *sos* *sos*

I was closed to you?


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: UberNoob on November 14, 2007, 14:47:16 PM
*close *bear*


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: kingjohn on November 15, 2007, 17:16:15 PM
KingJohn.. why you when was closed to me cant do this developments and buildings?  *sos* *sos*
r
When I was in r9 first time playing I want to keep my points low so you can't kick my ass so I will be out of your 2X range  :P Rumours has it that despot was brutal. So better to keep out of your points range.  *YAHOO* *evil* *bear*
Seriously that time I wasn't using premium and was my first time playing the game. But I still did ok, I was rank 17 without premium. But luckily not in your 2X I think so you couldn't kill me. Sad eh??  *cry* *cry* *cry*


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: BeaZtiE on November 16, 2007, 18:37:27 PM
I was closed to you?
yes.. at R4.. i played with Random nickname :)
at R9 i was not more than 30-40 days with credits.. was not honest to play against noobs with credits..
actually last days i was killed 2 ways because was out of net and have not a credits to vacation.. one stupid polish kill me twice :) i told him  after first hit.. "i will forgive you..." but he raid me again..
after this from 500k+ soldiers he fins his empire with more terbs than soldiers :P i send the crazy WhiteWitch (with 800k army) against him.. and after this all my allies piss over him :) he never return back :P


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: kingjohn on November 28, 2007, 05:51:03 AM
yes.. at R4.. i played with Random nickname :)
at R9 i was not more than 30-40 days with credits.. was not honest to play against noobs with credits..
actually last days i was killed 2 ways because was out of net and have not a credits to vacation.. one stupid polish kill me twice :) i told him  after first hit.. "i will forgive you..." but he raid me again..
after this from 500k+ soldiers he fins his empire with more terbs than soldiers :P i send the crazy WhiteWitch (with 800k army) against him.. and after this all my allies piss over him :) he never return back :P

I know you are talking about Stirling Versus Whitewitch. Stirling is about 300 distance from me at r9 that time.


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: BeaZtiE on December 11, 2007, 19:32:30 PM
I think.. this was the best battle ever i make last 2+ years..

some background..
my opponent have cartography level 7 and have more than 2000 distance from me...
he make a long save mission on distance 2000+
my hit must kill the opponent when he is online 56+ mins after his 6 h. block
i must go at my 6 h. block :)

i send my army on exact time to hit the opponent 3 seconds after his army return.. actually i hit him with one second the difference..

the result (thanks to my opponent for this information.. he will be anonymous, because lost really huge number of soldiers)
2007-12-11 08:56:37 GAMEMASTER A battle was fought.Slaytanic attacked c...
2007-12-11 08:56:36 GAMEMASTER In province 9 have returned Phalanx - 18...

that means his army return at home at 08:56:36 and my gang bang hit him at 08:56:37

the result:
Slaytanic(BUBAMARA)   Anonymous Opponent(DarkSTAR)   31731   2225710   4549   67762   0   0   2115
i win to morale 61 (after a week i can publish the result.. if someone wanna see it..)

i think.. this was my really best battle ever i do.. thanks to my opponent, than he is not become angry for me..
actually lot of players think than this is just a luck.. but i wanna tell to all than luck don't exist in this came.. just pure maths :)

actually i am happy, because is really hard to catch on right time the carto level 7 in distance more than 2000.. but.. i do this..
i have only one week to try to catch opponent with carto level 6 in exact time.. will try.. :) but i am not sure in my success :)

PS
the game without online player status is just a kid game.. have not sense. good players cant use them knowledge to kill the opponents.. and this really will piss over the game and over the good players....


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: Radooo on December 11, 2007, 19:46:20 PM
I think you can post the battle report if your target will agree (this happened before) :)


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: Leila on December 14, 2007, 01:11:50 AM
No comment...

(http://img218.imageshack.us/img218/6333/marshal1at1.jpg)


 *bravo* *bravo* *bravo* *bravo* *bravo*

I hope IO realms will see zillions of such marshals in future...


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: Radooo on December 14, 2007, 11:34:20 AM
Don't say that...Andreas is unique :D


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: Amaterasu on December 14, 2007, 12:11:29 PM
Don't say that...Andreas is unique :D

Thanks my friend for your kind words *bear*, although i am an uncurable medical case  *freak*

  Why are you been sarcastic leila? Do you get a game and someone says not only the rules but the strategy and you follow blindly with not a hint of difference? Without anything original any try to seek and explore the game mechanisms and how and why the game ticks. Then the game fast becomes a mechanical movement you do the same old things everyday, everyhour. No this is not the purpose of gaming apart from entairtainment the principle of gaming is to sharpen your mind and make you think and respond in a situation with different approach. I play games from the moment that i became aware of my existance. I try to seek new pathways and widen already exist horizons.
  As for IO in all my realms i was a good farmer, i was a reliable alliance player as i played mix way there. So the other one i wanted to try was pillager how far the morale can go in a offense how much money can you amass, how can you evade enemies and finaly how much net and military score can you amass from those actions. As you can see the expirement was succesful, at least from my point of view, and trust me i learned so many things about the game in this realm as a unhorable pillager than a few era's of been killing and growing stuff. That is why i harbor the outmost respect to people who try new things and expand their gaming view. I did not braged (not untill the last 2 weeks which they asked me and it became obvious what i had done and then i only answered questions) nor advertized my game style cause i dislike doing so (apart from friend making fun about it).

Cheers to all and flame not the different way, instead examine it and if it suits your needs embrace it, let it grow and flourish. Take away its drawback, plant your advantage and you have a recipe for fun and success. And if you dislike it or otherwise hate it, ignore it or make your strategy to counter it.
Andreas

PS
If you have any questions or remarks, anyone of you guys and gals i will appreciate and be happy to answer your questions or learn from you in private corespondance.


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: Leila on December 14, 2007, 13:13:59 PM
Quote
Then the game fast becomes a mechanical movement you do the same old things everyday, everyhour.

mhm maybe pillaging empty provicne during offline time of player * 1000 times for period of 4 months (actually it was much less as I can see) is not mechanical??? or the farming process to get enough pop for so many pillages is not mechanical???

maybe not fighting 1 real battle is the way to expand gameplay and to feel the MASSIVE-MULTIPLAYER-ONLINE spirit???

and how you respond to any situation with different approach? you've been doing the same things for the period of whole era - hiding and pillaging :) you didn't have to build real army and to think of it's protection...just disband all peasants and hire new before logging off. very very creative gameplay :) in fact every type of empire, which is capable of surviving requires set of repetative actions to be done...but creativity may be achieved in every single battle even if the army is supported by the most conservatively developed empire -> not fighting battles = not playing 90% of the game


You're actually exploiting bug/non-workin feature and calling this something like "finding new frontiers of gameplay" is simply ridiculous. The penalty for each 100 negative honor points is supposed to be not only -5 starting morale but also -5% production bonus, so at one point empires based solely on pillages wouldn't be able to survive. Unfortunately, like other features, this one is also not working at the moment and allows abusing.

And yes - it is a way to achieve results in the final rank table, but the final rank table is not the game itself ;o it's just ego-pumping tool.

However it is your right to play the way you like to and the reason I posted your achievment here is because it is in fact record. It doesn't matter that it's exactly the opposite of what I consider interesting/creative gameplay... I can only hope for such pillager in realm where I play;o to teach him some lessons....


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: Leila on December 14, 2007, 13:35:32 PM
As I said this type of gameplay is exploiting bugs/non-working features.

- if the production penalty was applied no troops could be hired after his army is wiped out
- if the morale of defender was affected by honor no defensive strategy could be used after certain point of honor drop since defender's field army would flee after first round and even lvl7 fort with ANY garrison is easily beatable

unfortunately these features are not working and allow such abusive strategies

However I have very good plan to work against such pillagers :] maybe it will be hard for one person, but two will most likely force him to quit or at least do times more harm to him than his pillages will do to both firemen :]] Btw there aren't unbeatalbe strategies, only weak/discouraged/unimaginative players ;o
I could explain what has to be done against this pilliging strategy but not in this topic..enough spam.

And why not speaking about lessons? Maybe you know someone who teached me "forced" lessons? Definitely not...especially not such "masters"...


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: Radooo on December 14, 2007, 13:41:30 PM
He tried something new, not the same thing like the other eras. In the past he play as a farmer. Is interesting to try other kind of strategies and you will learn a lot from everyone :)


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: Lembitu on December 14, 2007, 17:03:33 PM
You could also say that ,negative honor gained for pillage is a bug. Why do we think that winning an enemy  with fortress siege is worth of positive honor but pillage is not.  Those villagers that army kills, are part of the empire and thus aren't guiltless. The people are the root of the empire and thus need to be slaughtered.  *evil*


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: stud on December 14, 2007, 17:05:31 PM
You could also say that ,negative honor gained for pillage is a bug. Why do we think that winning an enemy  with fortress siege is worth of positive honor but pillage is not.  Those villagers that army kills, are part of the empire and thus aren't guiltless. The people are the root of the empire and thus need to be slaughtered.  *evil*

kill 'em all  *evil* *evil* *evil*


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: Leila on December 14, 2007, 18:31:17 PM
 *bravo* *bravo* *bravo* *bravo* *bravo*





Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: stud on December 15, 2007, 00:26:25 AM
 *bear*   *bear*   *bear*   *bear*   *bear*


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: Amaterasu on December 15, 2007, 00:44:10 AM
What what? Did i done something wrong?  ??? I only "liberated" 32.520.351 souls that consoled with the enemy but keep it between us  :-X (The last one was a general that denied a direct order to pillage Hiske's province *crazy*) Do i get a promotion to black plague?   *xxx* I do have an offer from Hades to be the doorman since Makis took the warhound Cerberus for a walk in Realm4 *evil* And lost it so if you see a black three headed dog with white spot please call at 458-89859-85845-59886 reward given.


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: UberNoob on December 15, 2007, 11:03:43 AM
nice one there, andreas :)
idk if it's the record tho....i had a bulgarian friend in R2E3 (or E4? mihai, makis or whoever.....help me out *freak*) with a whole bunch of pillages....lots n lots.


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: k_mihai on December 15, 2007, 11:05:54 AM
r4 i think :) yes, there were many there with pillages


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: Reaccão on December 19, 2007, 16:09:45 PM
I think there are a couple of records here:

61 wars won (against 60 different alliances)

65 wars total (including BUBAMARA)

440 points (7,2 points average per war won)

(http://i225.photobucket.com/albums/dd220/belgarion015/r4endd.jpg)
(http://i225.photobucket.com/albums/dd220/belgarion015/morewars.jpg)


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: Reaccão on December 19, 2007, 16:17:51 PM
Another record:

(http://i156.photobucket.com/albums/t27/hiiske/bigwar-2.jpg)


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: Naylrod on December 19, 2007, 16:34:28 PM
I think there are a couple of records here:

61 wars won (against 60 different alliances)

65 wars total (including BUBAMARA)

440 points (7,2 points average per war won)

(http://i225.photobucket.com/albums/dd220/belgarion015/r4endd.jpg)


I have heard rumors about the alliances you faced. It is said that they consisted entirely of goldcoiners, farmers and/or noobs!


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: Reaccão on December 19, 2007, 16:36:06 PM
I have heard rumors about the alliances you faced. It is said that they consisted entirely of goldcoiners, farmers and/or noobs!

That is entirely true   :) :) :) every one of them.


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: Naylrod on December 19, 2007, 17:29:54 PM
That is entirely true   :) :) :) every one of them.
:D


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: Radooo on December 19, 2007, 18:51:27 PM
Since it's almost the end of era in R4, I'll post this:

(http://i225.photobucket.com/albums/dd169/radooo22/cartography.jpg)

(http://i225.photobucket.com/albums/dd169/radooo22/cartography_needed.jpg)

 *freak* *freak* *hihi*


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: k_mihai on December 19, 2007, 19:57:47 PM
well, i wonder if i should post also my link to my borders 10 and main fort 6 :D


radooo, u farmer, u had higher borders than me :P


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: Hiske on December 19, 2007, 19:58:35 PM
I don't know if it's really a record; but I'll post it anyway:

35 defensive victories :)
(http://i156.photobucket.com/albums/t27/hiiske/R11-defensive.jpg)

no one managed to steal my resources :) (but they have 4 hrs left... hehehe!)
(http://i156.photobucket.com/albums/t27/hiiske/resources.jpg)


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: Naylrod on December 19, 2007, 20:00:14 PM
I don't know if it's really a record; but I'll post it anyway:

35 defensive victories :)
(http://i156.photobucket.com/albums/t27/hiiske/R11-defensive.jpg)

no one managed to steal my resources :) (but they have 4 hrs left... hehehe!)
(http://i156.photobucket.com/albums/t27/hiiske/resources.jpg)

Respect!


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: Radooo on December 19, 2007, 20:03:48 PM
radooo, u farmer, u had higher borders than me :P

I have my border 14 from day 65...it was just to hide my fort 7 (which would finish in 20 hours) :D


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: k_mihai on December 19, 2007, 20:09:36 PM
I have my border 14 from day 65...it was just to hide my fort 7 (which would finish in 20 hours) :D

i had borders 10 since the war against teddies :P


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: Lembitu on December 20, 2007, 19:39:50 PM
I have 39 defensive victories in realm 5. In the previous blitz era my lv 7 fortress was never destroyed.  But thats off topic. Merry xmas. I just got home  so after I read my post I'll realize it's stupid. i'm  tired


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: ___justus_ on December 23, 2007, 16:24:31 PM
I don't know if it's really a record; but I'll post it anyway:

35 defensive victories :)
(http://i156.photobucket.com/albums/t27/hiiske/R11-defensive.jpg)

no one managed to steal my resources :) (but they have 4 hrs left... hehehe!)
(http://i156.photobucket.com/albums/t27/hiiske/resources.jpg)

35 defensive victories, 85.000 soldiers kill and no attack and two medal... :(
hımm...then i must say,this is a good defensive game example...congrats...I liked this... :-X      :)       :D


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: nasio on December 23, 2007, 17:16:09 PM
35 defensive victories, 85.000 soldiers kill and no attack and two medal... :(
hımm...then i must say,this is a good defensive game example...congrats...I liked this... :-X      :)       :D

justus ,,where were u ..long time away ,,we really missed u  *bear*


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: k_mihai on December 23, 2007, 17:20:56 PM
he`s in r10  :D


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: nasio on December 23, 2007, 17:30:09 PM
he`s in r10  :D

no he is  on vacation in realm10 too


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: nasio on December 23, 2007, 17:37:06 PM
soon we may have a new record  :D

this record will be for a player running in vacation mode from over 21 days,,each 48hours he log in ,vote and use 10hours credit,and he run again in vacation,he wants to save for fortress 8  :D
it will be the record for the newest saving tactic in IO :D


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: ___justus_ on December 23, 2007, 22:11:03 PM
as usual,you are very merciless  :)
I only am taking the holyday...I needed that...
now,I have few gram medicine,
no war...
life is beatiful           :D


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: nasio on December 23, 2007, 22:14:25 PM
as usual,you are very merciless  :)
I only am taking the holyday...I needed that...
I have few gram poison,
no war...
life is beatiful           :D


my dear justus,,really i am not joking here..i missed u ,,and i am happy that u are having ur vacation and enjoying ur life,,u r really a good player but needs a little experience to become better,,the game missed u ,,come back and play in 5,don t keep the gold icon next to your name ,,it is not good for ur name ,there still 4 monthes so u can build a big army and to have efun,,don t quit  *bear*


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: ___justus_ on December 23, 2007, 22:35:14 PM
no,I didn't leave...I could not give the time in realm 10...
but i think turn again...Now , the holyday good  :)


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: nasio on December 23, 2007, 22:38:53 PM
no,I didn't leave...I could not give the time in realm 10...
but i think turn again...Now , the holyday good  :)

great to know that justus,,this game is for fun and to learn more things everyday,and sure holiday makes us refreshed so we can focus better and thing positively without pressure ,only fun *rose*



Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: nasio on December 24, 2007, 21:23:13 PM
soon we may have a new record  :D

this record will be for a player running in vacation mode from over 21 days,,each 48hours he log in ,vote and use 10hours credit,and he run again in vacation,he wants to save for fortress 8  :D
it will be the record for the newest saving tactic in IO :D

 :( the funny thing ,he came today from vacation and i sent for him that welcome back and after few hours i saw that he capitulate to me  :(


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: Lembitu on December 26, 2007, 17:08:06 PM
What's the record for the lowest morale ? I was attacked by player who ended up with  3 morale.  I would like if the system automatically  saves the best  achivements over the years.  Like etc, most points,best lap time, most pole positions.


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: nasio on December 26, 2007, 17:12:26 PM
What's the record for the lowest morale ? I was attacked by player who ended up with  3 morale.  I would like if the system automatically  saves the best  achivements over the years.  Like etc, most points,best lap time, most pole positions.

well i think the lowest morale was for mithratir in realm 4 last era,,he had  more than -3000 honor so he start at -40 morale and win all his pillages  :D


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: Lembitu on December 26, 2007, 17:23:09 PM
well i think the lowest morale was for mithratir in realm 4 last era,,he had  more than -3000 honor so he start at -40 morale and win all his pillages  :D
A true hero  *rose*


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: Radooo on December 26, 2007, 18:59:07 PM
That's not a record nasio...
@Lembitu, I think I saw somewhere someone with 1 or 3 morale at the end :)


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: nasio on December 26, 2007, 21:33:30 PM
That's not a record nasio...
@Lembitu, I think I saw somewhere someone with 1 or 3 morale at the end :)

who can put it for us  *bear*


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: papaianis on December 27, 2007, 00:43:35 AM
well i think the lowest morale was for mithratir in realm 4 last era,,he had  more than -3000 honor so he start at -40 morale and win all his pillages  :D
i think the lowest morale had bunicutz...he was just little than mithratir at networth..


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: k_mihai on December 27, 2007, 00:50:39 AM
lowest honor, yes, smth like - 4000 last era for bunicutz :D


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: numpty on December 27, 2007, 00:58:34 AM
http://www4.imperiaonline.org/smf/index.php/topic,19710.0.html

that´s the lowest i´ve seen, 0...


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: Naylrod on January 20, 2008, 22:47:40 PM
Don't know if it's a record but in R4 I am currently boxed in at 646 points. I could get it lower by disbanding my troops, but I kind of need them to kill innocent noobs.

I use the extremely low point strategy.  :D

Naylrod Dexter 646   


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: Spiridon on January 20, 2008, 23:01:00 PM
lowest honor, yes, smth like - 4000 last era for bunicutz :D

I couldn' t check myself but an ally reported yesterday afternoon that the honor score of Skeletan in realm 1 was -52717.  :) He had probably improved this achievement.  :D


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: kingjohn on January 21, 2008, 09:20:05 AM
r2 is getting so bored,This is the first time only 8 people in my 2X range.  No friends to talk to because I forgot about them when they exit my 2X range.  *cry* *cry* *cry*

http://img254.imageshack.us/my.php?image=2xranger2kg4.jpg


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: UberNoob on January 21, 2008, 09:52:40 AM
are you complaining or bragging? *pardon*


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: kingjohn on January 21, 2008, 10:02:45 AM
both!! I am happy there is so little people in my 2X so not much can attack but at the same time I have no one to talk to because there is too little people in my 2X, so it's kind of boring!!


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: UberNoob on January 21, 2008, 10:12:36 AM
you only talk to people in your 2X? arrogant and condescending guy.... :D


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: kingjohn on January 21, 2008, 11:53:59 AM
you only talk to people in your 2X? arrogant and condescending guy.... :D

I can't see them in my 2X, so I can't talk to them or forgot to talk to them :D


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: k_mihai on January 21, 2008, 12:00:11 PM
john, ssst, u`re contradiction yourself

u complain about other realms for being too competitive (r4, r9), then u complain that R2 is too boring  :D


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: kingjohn on January 21, 2008, 12:35:15 PM
farming is getting abit too boring for me.


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: Leila on January 21, 2008, 12:41:36 PM
johnie, come to r25 :) it's still not too late :p and btw you have plazma in your 2x ... isn't she cool?


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: kingjohn on January 21, 2008, 12:45:58 PM
johnie, come to r25 :) it's still not too late :p and btw you have plazma in your 2x ... isn't she cool?

Who is plazma? your friend or that is you? LoL :P Nah, I am not coming r25.  X) Between, I have NAP with plazma  *bear* Simply put in more simple words, I got NAP with everyone in the 2X you saw.


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: Leila on January 21, 2008, 13:02:16 PM
no, it's not me :] i think she's one cool user from bg forum..but i don't know her ...but if i had only 8 people in 2x i'd most likely talk to some of them...not complain that it's boring hehehe :D u rule anyway  :D + karma


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: kingjohn on January 21, 2008, 15:08:46 PM
Without much communication in the game it's boring.  *tired*


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: UberNoob on January 21, 2008, 15:25:44 PM
Without much communication in the game it's boring.  *tired*
why would u want communication anyway? no attacks for u to plan with ur rop-tier friends, are there, since you're farming? *bear*


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: Naylrod on January 21, 2008, 16:38:58 PM
Hey, King! Reopen your account in R9. My alliance are killing off your former Greenpeace pals. They might need you  :D


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: kingjohn on January 21, 2008, 17:09:00 PM
not interested to reopen r9 account. :D


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: Naylrod on January 21, 2008, 17:20:35 PM
not interested to reopen r9 account. :D

Ok, I thought you wanted action!


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: kingjohn on January 21, 2008, 17:24:08 PM
my nick there is gold coin, I didn't put in vacation mode to donate gold.  *bear*


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: k_mihai on January 21, 2008, 18:18:36 PM
he communicates trough capitulation :D


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: _muptiii_ on January 24, 2008, 14:30:59 PM
high level military recearchs

(http://img462.imageshack.us/img462/5273/capturedep7.jpg)


(http://img340.imageshack.us/img340/4308/capturedfc1.jpg)


new record from little justus
he posted me these screens and told ''I m the king'

(http://img518.imageshack.us/img518/6349/adszmu5.jpg) 
 :D  *hahaha*


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: k_mihai on January 24, 2008, 14:32:57 PM
i think everybody who plays in a 8 month era, or R10 and has elites has already achieved melee and armor 14  :D


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: UberNoob on January 24, 2008, 22:08:34 PM
second set of  screen shots, mihai ;)


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: Radooo on January 29, 2008, 14:47:30 PM
Yay *YAHOO* *YAHOO*

(http://i264.photobucket.com/albums/ii190/radooo_imp/minus.jpg)

P.S. I don't have anyone in my range...not even me :D

(http://i264.photobucket.com/albums/ii190/radooo_imp/minus2.jpg)

And I can attack players even if I have less than 50 points :o :o


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: Xpertiza on January 29, 2008, 15:16:05 PM
 :o :D


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: kingjohn on January 29, 2008, 15:23:08 PM
How did u manage to get negative networth?  :o :o :o


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: Radooo on January 29, 2008, 15:28:18 PM
I used an anti-farming strategy :D :D (I have 0 medicine and I had 0 population until disbanding my army) :D


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: kingjohn on January 29, 2008, 15:30:49 PM
I used an anti-farming strategy :D :D (I have 0 medicine and I had 0 population until disbanding my army) :D

but still how could that generate negative points?


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: Radooo on January 29, 2008, 15:34:52 PM
I don't know exactly how, but I guess it's from my cavalry or my rams...normally I should have 200 points because I still have an army and have about 100 points from buildings and researches, but now I'm under the level of the sea :D


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: Q-bura on January 29, 2008, 15:39:46 PM
 *xxx* *xxx* *xxx*


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: licancina on January 29, 2008, 16:15:35 PM
that's just great, another very nice bug in this wonderful game... :(


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: Radooo on January 29, 2008, 16:23:45 PM
Bug? Where did you see bug? :D
I only took some negative points on credit... I think they want to give back those negative points :-X
And just before disbanding my army I took a small loan of 0 gold and I have to give back 0 gold :-X


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: Radooo on January 29, 2008, 18:52:28 PM
I'm a ghost or Superman...I can kill or pillage all top farmers. And I'll start with Tsubasa :D

(http://i264.photobucket.com/albums/ii190/radooo_imp/hehe2.jpg)


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: Machucado on January 29, 2008, 19:03:53 PM
I'm a ghost or Superman...I can kill or pillage all top farmers. And I'll start with Tsubasa :D


I always knew you were special...  *rose* *rose*


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: Radooo on January 29, 2008, 19:11:13 PM
I always knew you were special...  *rose* *rose*

Because you are a good reporter...And I like your news :D


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: kingjohn on February 13, 2008, 15:50:57 PM
I currently have the largest army in r2.  *rose*

http://img126.imageshack.us/my.php?image=armysizezt3.jpg


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: carman on February 16, 2008, 01:06:13 AM
Bug? Where did you see bug? :D
I only took some negative points on credit... I think they want to give back those negative points :-X
And just before disbanding my army I took a small loan of 0 gold and I have to give back 0 gold :-X

                              i neede a laugh today (found  it) thanks :D


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: Amaterasu on February 16, 2008, 22:14:16 PM
There is only one remedy to the plague of pillagers that run amok in this realm, draft all yer ppl to man the walls of your castles. Send them away to foreign lands, hide them beyond our reach cause we are coming to color our weapons in the crimson rivers of your subjects. The hooves of our horses will be the plow that will plough the earth of your empire your blood will be the water that will moister the earth and your lifeless corpses will be the seed that will florish to give birth to our new and glorious empire of terror. PILLAGERS UNITE  *evil* or archers ignite whatever you like best  *cool*

(http://i149.photobucket.com/albums/s48/kimmerios/Banners-Signatures/Anti-Pillager.jpg)

PS
I was a bit bored today at work  *pardon*


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: Radooo on February 16, 2008, 23:20:58 PM
Nice Amaterasu :D

P.S. You have big bureaucracy, right? *pardon*


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: carman on February 17, 2008, 00:15:41 AM
sweet pillagers delight :D


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: kingjohn on February 18, 2008, 07:13:45 AM
There is only one remedy to the plague of pillagers that run amok in this realm, draft all yer ppl to man the walls of your castles. Send them away to foreign lands, hide them beyond our reach cause we are coming to color our weapons in the crimson rivers of your subjects. The hooves of our horses will be the plow that will plough the earth of your empire your blood will be the water that will moister the earth and your lifeless corpses will be the seed that will florish to give birth to our new and glorious empire of terror. PILLAGERS UNITE  *evil* or archers ignite whatever you like best  *cool*

(http://i149.photobucket.com/albums/s48/kimmerios/Banners-Signatures/Anti-Pillager.jpg)

PS
I was a bit bored today at work  *pardon*

With so little villagers, better not use your credits to claim bonus resources  X)


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: Krum on February 27, 2008, 11:13:51 AM
http://statika.imperiaonline.org/imperia/game/_addons/dokladi/?path=bitki/10/2008_2_27/9042553_9049273_346431 (http://statika.imperiaonline.org/imperia/game/_addons/dokladi/?path=bitki/10/2008_2_27/9042553_9049273_346431)

Finally someone broke numpty's record...and got blocked ofc. :evil4:


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: k_mihai on February 27, 2008, 11:50:24 AM
http://statika.imperiaonline.org/imperia/game/_addons/dokladi/?path=bitki/10/2008_2_27/9042553_9049273_346431 (http://statika.imperiaonline.org/imperia/game/_addons/dokladi/?path=bitki/10/2008_2_27/9042553_9049273_346431)

Finally someone broke numpty's record...and got blocked ofc. :evil4:

wow :D


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: stud on February 27, 2008, 11:56:14 AM
http://statika.imperiaonline.org/imperia/game/_addons/dokladi/?path=bitki/10/2008_2_27/9042553_9049273_346431 (http://statika.imperiaonline.org/imperia/game/_addons/dokladi/?path=bitki/10/2008_2_27/9042553_9049273_346431)

Finally someone broke numpty's record...and got blocked ofc. :evil4:


:o :o :o



Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: UberNoob on February 27, 2008, 14:12:17 PM
http://statika.imperiaonline.org/imperia/game/_addons/dokladi/?path=bitki/10/2008_2_27/9042553_9049273_346431 (http://statika.imperiaonline.org/imperia/game/_addons/dokladi/?path=bitki/10/2008_2_27/9042553_9049273_346431)

Finally someone broke numpty's record...and got blocked ofc. :evil4:

 *sos* *sos* *sos*


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: Nebthe on February 27, 2008, 14:14:56 PM
http://statika.imperiaonline.org/imperia/game/_addons/dokladi/?path=bitki/10/2008_2_27/9042553_9049273_346431 (http://statika.imperiaonline.org/imperia/game/_addons/dokladi/?path=bitki/10/2008_2_27/9042553_9049273_346431)

Finally someone broke numpty's record...and got blocked ofc. :evil4:


Poor Numpty!  :head_hurts_kr: He was finally on the right track of leaving this game and now he got a good reason to continue....  *SCRATCH*


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: numpty on February 28, 2008, 01:10:27 AM
http://statika.imperiaonline.org/imperia/game/_addons/dokladi/?path=bitki/10/2008_2_27/9042553_9049273_346431 (http://statika.imperiaonline.org/imperia/game/_addons/dokladi/?path=bitki/10/2008_2_27/9042553_9049273_346431)

Finally someone broke numpty's record...and got blocked ofc. :evil4:

rookie´s and noobs I tell you, some people just don´t get it...but you know that 61 million isn´t the record, now don´t you krum *crazy*

Poor Numpty!  :head_hurts_kr: He was finally on the right track of leaving this game and now he got a good reason to continue....  *SCRATCH*

now I have to start all over again, nebthe, all you need to do is spend 3 months making a big army, then when i call you in romania, disband, disband, disband...100 million here we come :hard: :hard: :hard:



Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: 5tormlord on February 29, 2008, 01:13:53 AM
0.0 61..million...that guy must of been ****** :rant: :rant:.   Has he ever played again? Hasnt anyone checked he hasnt jumped off a cliff?  *pardon*


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: Xpertiza on March 02, 2008, 04:16:21 AM
http://statika.imperiaonline.org/imperia/game/_addons/dokladi/?path=bitki/10/2008_2_27/9042553_9049273_346431 (http://statika.imperiaonline.org/imperia/game/_addons/dokladi/?path=bitki/10/2008_2_27/9042553_9049273_346431)

Finally someone broke numpty's record...and got blocked ofc. :evil4:
romanians know how to crash market  *easy*


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: Teardrop on March 03, 2008, 08:38:21 AM
A very special gift for Amaterasu: http://statika.imperiaonline.org/imperia/game/_addons/dokladi/?path=bitki/1/2008_1_19/58929_153525_216295
With burning love!


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: Teardrop on March 03, 2008, 11:35:33 AM
I didn't say this is all from pillages. It's not a record, it's just interesting fact. I like to win batles at that moral rate and the pillage is the only one that can be won with negative moral.


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: UberNoob on March 03, 2008, 13:29:14 PM
skeletan and caligula, huh? veteran R1 players, i believe  *bear*


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: darkkona on May 03, 2008, 18:42:33 PM
what is the record of military points?


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: darkkona on May 06, 2008, 18:11:49 PM
Fight@realm 10

2565 honor
130 851 military points
4 164 262 enemy troops slaughtered

these are best results ever achieved


(http://img90.imageshack.us/img90/6876/doblestfr7.jpg)
(http://img363.imageshack.us/img363/9395/statsci2.jpg)


And one humble record-wannabe from me :-[ - 33 round siege battle
http://statika.imperiaonline.org/imperia/game/_addons/dokladi/?path=bitki/5/2007_9_7/3201295_3169671_619660 (http://statika.imperiaonline.org/imperia/game/_addons/dokladi/?path=bitki/5/2007_9_7/3201295_3169671_619660)


no way, i have killed more soldiers


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: makavelis on May 06, 2008, 18:15:48 PM
there was a bulgarian player in r5 last era that had 270000 military points  :head_hurts_kr:


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: Radooo on May 06, 2008, 18:34:58 PM

no way, i have killed more soldiers

It's your problem *pardon*


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: darkkona on May 06, 2008, 20:58:32 PM
there was a bulgarian player in r5 last era that had 270000 military points  :head_hurts_kr:

wow, thanks  *ok*


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: tiger on May 09, 2008, 12:15:13 PM
yes, but r5 was 8 month long last era. And and the other screenshot is from blitz. There should be different ranking for blitz, 4 and 8 month era. :) if i managed to kill over 2 mil soldiers in last month of 4 month era with 10 day vacation i guess its possible to kill more then 4 mil in 8 month era, if the person have time. :)


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: ciprianus on May 09, 2008, 12:45:17 PM
yes, but r5 was 8 month long last era. And and the other screenshot is from blitz. There should be different ranking for blitz, 4 and 8 month era. :) if i managed to kill over 2 mil soldiers in last month of 4 month era with 10 day vacation i guess its possible to kill more then 4 mil in 8 month era, if the person have time. :)

yes you're right


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: Naylrod on May 09, 2008, 17:24:54 PM
yes, but r5 was 8 month long last era. And and the other screenshot is from blitz. There should be different ranking for blitz, 4 and 8 month era. :) if i managed to kill over 2 mil soldiers in last month of 4 month era with 10 day vacation i guess its possible to kill more then 4 mil in 8 month era, if the person have time. :)

The current leader of kills (Micutzzz, no 2 rank) of the vac.-realm (9) have 2.7 million kills at this moment with almost 2 months to go so 4 million seems to be in reach. I am happy second with 2.1 million kills   *pardon*


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: KoSaC on May 11, 2008, 21:46:16 PM
i am wondering,what is highest negative honor ever recorded? :hmmm:


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: tiger on May 11, 2008, 21:50:11 PM
i am wondering,what is highest negative honor ever recorded? :hmmm:
If you read this topic, you will find the answer. :) Somebody wrote the number but i forgot. But this isnt hard. As somebody allready said you find target at your 3x and attack and recall whole day and you get as much negative honor as you wish. :)


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: KoSaC on May 11, 2008, 22:02:55 PM
well i think the lowest morale was for mithratir in realm 4 last era,,he had  more than -3000 honor so he start at -40 morale and win all his pillages  :D
yes,here it is..i found a new talent...he has -635 honor in r10,and yet it is long way to go..:D


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: Naylrod on May 25, 2008, 12:08:59 PM
New record? I guess there is someone out there with a better kill/hit but I wanna know.

(http://b.imagehost.org/0015/record.jpg)


The soldiers I have killed divided by no of fights I've been in. 2211.7 at this moment.


It is lame to go for goldmines!  *rose*


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: tiger on May 25, 2008, 15:43:24 PM
Nice kill/loss ratio. :) I guess there are people with better. I always play not to lose to much and send good army composition against certain army. I have no screenshoot from that era because i formated hard drive and lost that pictures. :( But i killed more then 1,5 mil soldiers and lost less then 400k. And it was my first era i played IO. :) And only 1 defensive defeat whole 4 month. :) And that was in eras with online status, but i got atacked only 1. :)If we are talking about records.


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: Radooo on May 25, 2008, 15:50:27 PM
I saw marshalls with less than 150 battles for sure and who killed a lot of soldiers. I think even beaztie at R9 had a better number of soldiers killed per battle :P


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: Naylrod on May 25, 2008, 17:34:25 PM
I saw marshalls with less than 150 battles for sure and who killed a lot of soldiers. I think even beaztie at R9 had a better number of soldiers killed per battle :P

You think? I am pretty sure I am not the no 1 but thinking won't convince me.

Nice kill/loss ratio. :)

Thanks! But it's the kills/battle that turns me on.


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: Radooo on May 25, 2008, 18:16:58 PM
You think? I am pretty sure I am not the no 1 but thinking won't convince me.

I didn't make a printscreen to that to know sure (didn't know I should do it *freak*)...but I remember that he has less than 150 battles *pardon*


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: tiger on May 25, 2008, 18:25:30 PM
Yes, i remember some time ago a guy with less then 150 battle won military ranking with 2 mil soldiers killed. And if i can i will always destroy empty fort for resources, not for military points.


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: numpty on May 25, 2008, 21:11:23 PM
Nice kill/loss ratio. :) I guess there are people with better. I always play not to lose to much and send good army composition against certain army. I have no screenshoot from that era because i formated hard drive and lost that pictures. :( But i killed more then 1,5 mil soldiers and lost less then 400k. And it was my first era i played IO. :) And only 1 defensive defeat whole 4 month. :) And that was in eras with online status, but i got atacked only 1. :)If we are talking about records.

I was attacked once in realm4 era 2 when corwin attacked my empty fort 5 in the second month of the era and was not attacked anymore the entire era, then I went into realm 6 era 1 and ended the era with 36 attacks and 0 defensive losses, i wasn´t attacked all era.  in all that was 8 straight months being attacked only once in visible online status realms...

and i wasted beatzie´s 300k army also, icing on the cake :evil4:


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: KoSaC on May 25, 2008, 21:15:06 PM
 :o  i can take that down..if i got to v- mode for 10 months  *freak* btw,i only got attacked once since r38 began,so,,i may take your record down *freak*
but i am sure i will get attacked after posting this *pardon* too much of mean players from r38 *hihi*


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: tiger on May 25, 2008, 21:26:34 PM
It depends a lot how high on points person, and what strategy it uses. With low point strategy in some realms i had 7-8 defensive victories and no defeats and you stay low point and you wont get hit. Especially if you dont attack and provoke person arround your self and dont have a lot of resources. :) I made more then 2k attacks, farmed people fight 9 wars and at the end killed army of a guy who won networth. :) So i had enemies but i spent 4 month changing offline time which i will never do anymore.
your achievement is great, but on what networth you ended that era and with how many mil points? Because when you are in top 10  you play against people who are always online and much lower you play mostly against noobs or person who are not online so often. I admit there are great players low networth, but i usually kil alot of noobs when low on points.


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: KoSaC on May 25, 2008, 21:29:39 PM
It depends a lot how high on points person, and what strategy it uses. With low point strategy in some realms i had 7-8 defensive victories and no defeats and you stay low point and you wont get hit. Especially if you dont attack and provoke person arround your self and dont have a lot of resources. :) I made more then 2k attacks, farmed people fight 9 wars and at the end killed army of a guy who won networth. :) So i had enemies but i spent 4 month changing offline time which i will never do anymore.
your achievement is great, but on what networth you ended that era and with how many mil points? Because when you are in top 10  you play against people who are always online and much lower you play mostly against noobs or person who are not online so often. I admit there are great players low networth, but i usually kil alot of noobs when low on points.
yup,tiger is correct.i only got attacked 1 time because i had 3 k net points and 10 000 light's....now i lost them so i am not safe anymore  :hooray:


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: numpty on May 25, 2008, 21:35:24 PM
It depends a lot how high on points person, and what strategy it uses. With low point strategy in some realms i had 7-8 defensive victories and no defeats and you stay low point and you wont get hit. Especially if you dont attack and provoke person arround your self and dont have a lot of resources. :) I made more then 2k attacks, farmed people fight 9 wars and at the end killed army of a guy who won networth. :) So i had enemies but i spent 4 month changing offline time which i will never do anymore.
your achievement is great, but on what networth you ended that era and with how many mil points? Because when you are in top 10  you play against people who are always online and much lower you play mostly against noobs or person who are not online so often. I admit there are great players low networth, but i usually kil alot of noobs when low on points.

in realm 4 era 2 i finished in 3rd with three stars (i was deleted the last three days of the era cause krum is a cheater *bravo*) and in realm 6 i finished in 2nd with 2 stars i think.  i cant recall how many wars we fought in those realms, but they were many, i think 17 in realm 4 era 2, less in realm 6.  i usually play high net worth, in realm 17 i am shooting for 2 million points (i should be able to build granaries level 50), very few attacks though...


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: numpty on May 25, 2008, 21:39:20 PM
:o  i can take that down..if i got to v- mode for 10 months  *freak* btw,i only got attacked once since r38 began,so,,i may take your record down *freak*
but i am sure i will get attacked after posting this *pardon* too much of mean players from r38 *hihi*

IO is not the same as it was before.  we now have many realms, not quite as competitive as it used to be when everyone was jammed into 4 realms.  when i played realm 6 it was already noobsville, realm 5 era 1 was the last era i played where there was a large amount of good players in one realm, now good players are spread out over many realms instead of concentrated in a few...


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: Radooo on May 25, 2008, 21:45:33 PM
IO is not the same as it was before.  we now have many realms, not quite as competitive as it used to be when everyone was jammed into 4 realms.  when i played realm 6 it was already noobsville, realm 5 era 1 was the last era i played where there was a large amount of good players in one realm, now good players are spread out over many realms instead of concentrated in a few...

yeah...in my opinion, that's a big mistake IO team did *UNDECIDED*


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: tiger on May 25, 2008, 21:56:02 PM
I also agree with numpty and radoo.  To many realms so little competition for good players. And a lot of bugs, changes(not always good). I can finally say honestly that curently i am not playing any realm. I could easily choose 1 of weaker and farm 8 months and i guess i would win networth, but for what. Not even a saved score on the end of era somewhere else then on my screenshoot.


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: KoSaC on May 25, 2008, 21:58:33 PM
I also agree with numpty and radoo.  To many realms so little competition for good players. And a lot of bugs, changes(not always good). I can finally say honestly that curently i am not playing any realm. I could easily choose 1 of weaker and farm 8 months and i guess i would win networth, but for what. Not even a saved score on the end of era somewhere else then on my screenshoot.
please do it,in r6 *freak* i need farmers-members to get me higher limit in alliance treasury *freak*


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: k_mihai on May 25, 2008, 22:32:22 PM
also, r9 is a 8 months era

btw, in r1 were players in top 10 mil with 15-16 offensive victories last era...


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: KoSaC on May 26, 2008, 10:37:38 AM
i think i ensured my self from attacks.....maybe record falls down  *freak*
i got myself 5 provinces and i need one lvl of tactic to get heavy spears at 3300 points (exactly) in version 4 realm (centralization is freakin' expensive there) *freak* i might dismiss lights and try to go in minus points but i will rather spend them in fight  *freak*


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: Naylrod on May 27, 2008, 19:53:44 PM
A record in most different icons maybe.  *hahaha*

(http://b.imagehost.org/0528/icons.jpg)
military rank, medals, vac, ban, goldcoin



Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: KoSaC on May 27, 2008, 19:55:50 PM
 *hahaha* this guy is a real jewel :D


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: bran360 on May 27, 2008, 20:02:31 PM
 *hahaha* *xxx*


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: numpty on May 28, 2008, 00:29:34 AM
i just built my 1st ever level 51 granary, hopefully i can get to granary level 60.  In an 8 month realm, realm 17...

wondering if anyone heard of any higher level of granary?  with level 19 arquitecture, takes 9 hours, 54 minutes...


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: Grif on May 28, 2008, 00:42:01 AM
i just built my 1st ever level 51 granary, hopefully i can get to granary level 60.  In an 8 month realm, realm 17...

wondering if anyone heard of any higher level of granary?  with level 19 arquitecture, takes 9 hours, 54 minutes...

farmer....  *WALL*  *WALL*  *WALL*


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: Цезар on May 28, 2008, 00:50:24 AM
i just built my 1st ever level 51 granary, hopefully i can get to granary level 60.  In an 8 month realm, realm 17...

wondering if anyone heard of any higher level of granary?  with level 19 arquitecture, takes 9 hours, 54 minutes...
from level 50 the cost for the granaries is reduced  *freak* *freak* you can build 100 level without a problem


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: KoSaC on May 28, 2008, 00:52:37 AM
weirdos :P


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: k_mihai on May 28, 2008, 01:00:16 AM
i just built my 1st ever level 51 granary, hopefully i can get to granary level 60.  In an 8 month realm, realm 17...

wondering if anyone heard of any higher level of granary?  with level 19 arquitecture, takes 9 hours, 54 minutes...

don't tell King John :D



Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: darkkona on May 28, 2008, 03:17:54 AM
i just built my 1st ever level 51 granary, hopefully i can get to granary level 60.  In an 8 month realm, realm 17...

wondering if anyone heard of any higher level of granary?  with level 19 arquitecture, takes 9 hours, 54 minutes...

and you have almost 2 million net worth points, another record in 8 mounths realms
 :hooray:


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: darkkona on May 28, 2008, 04:16:18 AM
record of cheating goes to the alliance IMPERIOBR_ in realm 17(portuguese 1), they were all banned, about 20 members of them . and they r still war pushing. now they r just 4 members but they still have loads of accounts to enter in the alliance everyday to declare war and put them out again. they have created a new alliance, and they declared war on eachother to lose the war, so they can win more points, and they r still playing, cause mods just ban for 48h and then they come to cheat again and they r nearly winning the realm . this is unfair against an alliance who works all year with honesty and dedication and also we use allways the best strategy in the realm. but we r not the smartest ones, the smartest ones is IMPERIOBR_ cheaters, cause they blind the mods and they do it very well . so they can win the realm cause there is not enough work by the moderators to watch everything, so keep recruiting mods because imperia needs it, and especially when they decide to creat another 20 realms full of smarter ones trying to break the rules.


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: KoSaC on May 28, 2008, 10:30:28 AM
i am wondering what is record about MP got in war...i just saw results of war between 2 bulgarian alliances with over 150 000 MP got in it..
here it is :
 CRUSADERS     Fiery_kiss    88592   72494   2008-05-22 10:01:39   2008-05-24 10:01:39


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: Hiske on May 28, 2008, 10:41:10 AM
i am wondering what is record about MP got in war...i just saw results of war between 2 bulgarian alliances with over 150 000 MP got in it..
here it is :
 CRUSADERS     Fiery_kiss    88592   72494   2008-05-22 10:01:39   2008-05-24 10:01:39

WOW! :o I thought this was the record: http://www4.imperiaonline.org/forums/int/index.php?topic=601.msg25204#msg25204 *pardon*


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: KoSaC on May 28, 2008, 10:49:45 AM
:P this was war of 2 biggest alliances in which are most of farmers in top 50 in networth  :P


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: Radooo on May 28, 2008, 11:20:23 AM
in which realm?


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: Цезар on May 28, 2008, 11:25:42 AM
the war between fiery_kiss and crusaders in r10 is fixed , i mean most of them just crashed their armies in the enemy


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: Radooo on May 28, 2008, 11:28:03 AM
in r10 there are different rules...you can kill anyone's army in their offline so it's not that hard to score so many points *pardon*


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: Hiske on May 28, 2008, 11:40:38 AM
the war between fiery_kiss and crusaders in r10 is fixed , i mean most of them just crashed their armies in the enemy

which means it doesn't count! great news! *hihi*


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: numpty on May 30, 2008, 18:57:09 PM
(http://img77.imageshack.us/img77/7885/celeirosxr7.png)
after more than 2 years and just in the nick of time, I finally have a record, that with the new chagnes is truly, unequivocally a record! 

granary level 100, i finally got my own record, just for me that no one can beat!!!!! 


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: dusmas on May 30, 2008, 19:00:15 PM
give to us source code of IO and we will be better than you  *Angry* *Angry* *Angry*


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: KoSaC on June 01, 2008, 01:00:30 AM
here's one weird record...(if it is)
my member in r10 at the end of this era has 20 000 MP on 23 000 net points.
so for this i think he is setting 2 records:
1.general with lowest net points (and nope,radooo he didnt dismissed his army)
2.he has biggest average MP/net points i've ever seen....almost 1 MP on 1 net points *freak*


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: k_mihai on June 01, 2008, 04:05:38 AM
(http://img77.imageshack.us/img77/7885/celeirosxr7.png)
after more than 2 years and just in the nick of time, I finally have a record, that with the new chagnes is truly, unequivocally a record! 

granary level 100, i finally got my own record, just for me that no one can beat!!!!! 

congrats  *bear*


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: Radooo on June 01, 2008, 09:54:49 AM
here's one weird record...(if it is)
my member in r10 at the end of this era has 20 000 MP on 23 000 net points.
so for this i think he is setting 2 records:
1.general with lowest net points (and nope,radooo he didnt dismissed his army)
2.he has biggest average MP/net points i've ever seen....almost 1 MP on 1 net points *freak*

If I lose my army or I disband it, I'll have the same number of points (not always) *freak*


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: KoSaC on June 01, 2008, 10:28:08 AM
If I lose my army or I disband it, I'll have the same number of points (not always) *freak*
whatever..
btw,that member of mine is crazy..now he has 21 000 MP and 16 000 net points *freak*


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: Radooo on June 01, 2008, 10:33:59 AM
he can't beat mc (or even hiske) *freak*


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: KoSaC on June 01, 2008, 10:39:31 AM
he can't beat mc (or even hiske) *freak*
you haven't seen him....bloodthirstiest and craziest motherfu*ker in the world...he is most stubborn guy i ever met...he finds a target with fort 6,he attacks with 300 cats and loses...so next day he makes 600 cats and attacks it again. *freak*


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: Radooo on June 01, 2008, 11:01:13 AM
you haven't seen him....bloodthirstiest and craziest motherfu*ker in the world...he is most stubborn guy i ever met...he finds a target with fort 6,he attacks with 300 cats and loses...so next day he makes 600 cats and attacks it again. *freak*

then he is a noob *freak*


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: KoSaC on June 01, 2008, 11:05:26 AM
then he is a noob *freak*
um,nope...he won us 5 wars and he is in top 50 in MP  *freak*


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: Hiske on June 01, 2008, 11:11:12 AM
um,nope...he won us 5 wars and he is in top 50 in MP  *freak*

so??? that doesn't mean he isn't a noob!  *freak* *freak* *freak*


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: KoSaC on June 01, 2008, 11:20:05 AM
so??? that doesn't mean he isn't a noob!  *freak* *freak* *freak*
*sos*


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: darkkona on June 01, 2008, 13:07:42 PM
loooooool  *hahaha*


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: k_mihai on June 01, 2008, 14:26:00 PM
he could use the siege calculator :D


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: KoSaC on June 01, 2008, 14:27:58 PM
he could use the siege calculator :D
that's the problem....he doesnt know english so he probably doesnt know how to use it right  *pardon*


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: Repr on June 06, 2008, 15:48:32 PM
(http://img77.imageshack.us/img77/7885/celeirosxr7.png)
after more than 2 years and just in the nick of time, I finally have a record, that with the new chagnes is truly, unequivocally a record! 

granary level 100, i finally got my own record, just for me that no one can beat!!!!! 

(http://ocidb.com/albums/userpics/10133/beatnumpty.JPG) (http://ocidb.com/albums/userpics/10133/beatnumpty.JPG)
just couldnt resist



gotta love paint


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: k_mihai on June 06, 2008, 15:49:31 PM
OMG, i'm speechless  *hahaha*


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: KoSaC on June 06, 2008, 15:53:03 PM
farmers  *guns*


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: numpty on June 06, 2008, 22:05:37 PM
(http://ocidb.com/albums/userpics/10133/beatnumpty.JPG) (http://ocidb.com/albums/userpics/10133/beatnumpty.JPG)
just couldnt resist



gotta love paint


come on now repr, no paint used, im a real bad artist!  actually i have proof as krum is witness (i think he doubted it himself so he entered my account) there was no cheating, no paint, no mischief whatsoever, just a dedication to feeding my people that are fat, wide and very happy as a result of the high levels of grain they consume *xxx* *xxx* *xxx* *xxx*



Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: Krum on June 09, 2008, 11:38:45 AM
http://statika.imperiaonline.org/imperia/game/_addons/dokladi/?path=bitki/7/2008_6_4/6075553_6050784_96717 (http://statika.imperiaonline.org/imperia/game/_addons/dokladi/?path=bitki/7/2008_6_4/6075553_6050784_96717)

348 millions in a single battle.


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: greeklover on June 09, 2008, 11:55:30 AM
and it's not the first time that aykan and benmaske are pushing each other. Now all the "big" guys from turkey are pushing each other in the MP ranking.... how original right ?  *hahaha* *hahaha* why don't you guys make a search and remove the MP's those guys got from fixed battles ?


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: kingjohn on June 09, 2008, 12:03:43 PM
bloody hell, I am now jealous of the lvl 111 granary lvls.  *Angry* *Angry* *Angry* *Angry* Wait a minute, how come granary  lvl 111 doesn't cost any resources? Look at it and you notice it costs 0 wood, 0 iron and 0 stones? What realm is this? What realm is this? A 2 years old realm?


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: tiger on June 09, 2008, 13:31:45 PM
By old rules, all buildings were getting cheaper after lvl 33 i think. And at some points they became totally free so you could build as much as you wanted. Thats why there is a limit for some buildings at lvl 40.


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: Naylrod on June 09, 2008, 14:13:29 PM
What realm is this? What realm is this? A 2 years old realm?

That realm is called PhotoShop


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: k_mihai on June 10, 2008, 10:44:44 AM
Congrats! and for the killing of that "legend" from whiteturks  :hooray:


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: TAKIS on June 17, 2008, 12:27:54 PM
I managed a fortress 7 at 5599 networth points, without leaving the account for days  in vacation mode, without loan, without credits. I don't know if it is a record, please inform me about it.


(http://i179.photobucket.com/albums/w297/makatas/Imperia%20others/takisfort7.jpg)


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: k_mihai on June 17, 2008, 12:55:14 PM
i ordered one in r7 at 4000. numpty had that at lower points when he played low points


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: olsi on June 17, 2008, 19:10:56 PM
come on now repr, no paint used, im a real bad artist!  actually i have proof as krum is witness (i think he doubted it himself so he entered my account) there was no cheating, no paint, no mischief whatsoever, just a dedication to feeding my people that are fat, wide and very happy as a result of the high levels of grain they consume *xxx* *xxx* *xxx* *xxx*



Just curious how much did it cost?


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: tiger on June 17, 2008, 19:16:03 PM
Just curious how much did it cost?
It is visible on picture. 0 of every resource. For free. :)


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: olsi on June 17, 2008, 19:21:21 PM
It is visible on picture. 0 of every resource. For free. :)

Yeah. I didn't notice. At what level does it cost 0 of all resources?


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: KoSaC on June 17, 2008, 19:21:57 PM
50 i think


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: tiger on June 17, 2008, 19:40:12 PM
Yeah. I didn't notice. At what level does it cost 0 of all resources?
I think that after lvl 33(or arround that lvl) if  it starts to gets cheaper the same way it get more expensive at the beginning i would guess lvl 66 - 70. But i am not sure about that because i never get so high with granaries. And they implemented new limit for buildings like granaries, barracks at lvl 40 so no more granaries lvl 111. :)


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: numpty on June 18, 2008, 00:10:17 AM
somewhere near level 60 it started costing 0.  the last 42 levels were built instantly!


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: numpty on June 18, 2008, 00:13:50 AM
I managed a fortress 7 at 5599 networth points, without leaving the account for days  in vacation mode, without loan, without credits. I don't know if it is a record, please inform me about it.


(http://i179.photobucket.com/albums/w297/makatas/Imperia%20others/takisfort7.jpg)


i built a fort 7 with only one province once in plains.  cant remember how many points I had, but i pillaged thte hell out  of alliances to build it, in particular a french alliance, burned em all!  i recall someone going lower than my points though, i think somwhere near 4k but i cant recall...


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: belgarion on June 18, 2008, 16:32:45 PM
i think its awesome that he built it with such low points but not so clever to tell everyone i mean if he just built border out post now he could of got some great defensive wins but now most will know he will have a lvl 7 but great job all the same *ok*


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: olsi on June 19, 2008, 01:16:01 AM
somewhere near level 60 it started costing 0.  the last 42 levels were built instantly!

What about time?


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: realmlord2 on June 19, 2008, 11:16:40 AM
good job takis but i think i was attacking you at the start of the era before i quit  *freak* well good luck takis anyways  :hooray:


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: KoSaC on June 19, 2008, 11:26:42 AM
Well, realmlord all people make mistakes  *hihi* Too good you have left then  *hihi* but Takis mission isnt to avenge attacks at the moment anyway :hooray:
the question is how do you know that?  *black_eye* *freak*


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: TAKIS on June 19, 2008, 11:33:34 AM
You are right Belgarion, but, as Makatas said, it is just a game for fun for me. I am not playing seriously, just something to make the days before summer vacation a bit funnier. I did not want to build a fort7, it just came as an idea when I saw that no-one could siege my fort6...so afet collecting resources I decided on spending on fortress 7. I din't care if people know that its a fort7 now.....as long as I know that they cannot take it down :)
GOOD SUMMER TO ALL... *bear*


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: KoSaC on June 19, 2008, 11:37:05 AM
Takis happens to be a good real life friend, and I know al of his strategies and tactics  [:-}
cool. :)


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: k_mihai on June 19, 2008, 11:52:54 AM
the question is how do you know that?  *black_eye* *freak*

takis is the one who 2 cool chicks in the forum pics, which makis missed, i think :D


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: Naylrod on June 28, 2008, 22:26:35 PM
yes, but r5 was 8 month long last era. And and the other screenshot is from blitz. There should be different ranking for blitz, 4 and 8 month era. :) if i managed to kill over 2 mil soldiers in last month of 4 month era with 10 day vacation i guess its possible to kill more then 4 mil in 8 month era, if the person have time. :)

Now it's done and there is still a week to go.
VasHal the current leader of military in R9 has killed 4.1 million soldiers and have an amazing 153k mili-points.
I will post a screenshot when the era is done.


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: cosmo on June 30, 2008, 11:09:31 AM
I believe that in a blitz era like 10, nobody came that far with so many defensive defeats. I believe that I hold the guiness record.

(http://i299.photobucket.com/albums/mm291/isiliadis/record.jpg)


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: KoSaC on June 30, 2008, 11:13:21 AM
 *hahaha*


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: Radooo on June 30, 2008, 11:26:05 AM
I believe that in a blitz era like 10, nobody came that far with so many defensive defeats. I believe that I hold the guiness record.

I think that goldmines have more defensive defeats than you *pardon*


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: makavelis on June 30, 2008, 11:27:06 AM
maybe this is a record for active players  *pardon* *pardon* *pardon*


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: tiger on June 30, 2008, 11:35:32 AM
Now it's done and there is still a week to go.
VasHal the current leader of military in R9 has killed 4.1 million soldiers and have an amazing 153k mili-points.
I will post a screenshot when the era is done.
Well i saw guys with over 250 k military points in rankings in 8 or more then 8 month realms. I dont know how many kills they have. :)


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: Naylrod on June 30, 2008, 13:31:58 PM
Well i saw guys with over 250 k military points in rankings in 8 or more then 8 month realms. I dont know how many kills they have. :)

It was the 4 million kills that was the subject, the additional info about the 150k mili-points impressed me so it just happend to get into my post. and tonight I will kill that guy with 150k points  :hard:


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: Xpertiza on July 05, 2008, 10:13:51 AM
i had a verry nice battle in r11  *xxx*

http://statika.imperiaonline.org/imperia/game/_addons/dokladi/?path=bitki/11/2008_6_29/10015812_10008447_10684


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: Naylrod on July 05, 2008, 13:49:05 PM
i had a verry nice battle in r11  *xxx*

http://statika.imperiaonline.org/imperia/game/_addons/dokladi/?path=bitki/11/2008_6_29/10015812_10008447_10684

Holy crap! Buy some drinks for your soldiers...  *drunk*


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: KoSaC on July 05, 2008, 23:18:55 PM
who deployed heavies fastest...i got ready to mobilize 50 heavies on day 12 in r2 this era  *freak* today on day 13 i have 410 built and 300 heavies building  *gamer* i looked rumors..no one from top 5 players has heavies  *tired*  :hmmm:


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: KoSaC on July 05, 2008, 23:21:59 PM
What if they are garrisoned  *freak*
i doubt  *freak* i can check  *freak*


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: KoSaC on July 05, 2008, 23:32:05 PM
here's screenshot...it aint the best but you can barely see it.on rumors i have heavies and i have heavies building..also on the bottom is date,5. srpanj-that's todays date  *freak*
(http://img95.imageshack.us/img95/1533/clipboard01wx3.jpg) (http://imageshack.us)


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: realmlord2 on July 06, 2008, 09:55:38 AM
you can see me in there (lost)  *freak* and theres skhoom when we put him on vac mode  *hahaha* *hahaha* *hahaha* *hahaha* *hahaha* *hahaha*


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: KoSaC on July 06, 2008, 12:03:08 PM
you can see me in there (lost)  *freak* and theres skhoom when we put him on vac mode  *hahaha* *hahaha* *hahaha* *hahaha* *hahaha* *hahaha*
yup we did good job on him  *freak* now if i get out of target i may kill that unicorn alliance member and chase him in vac too...just this time i dont need your help  *freak* *hihi*


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: realmlord2 on July 06, 2008, 12:17:58 PM
yup we did good job on him  *freak* now if i get out of target i may kill that unicorn alliance member and chase him in vac too...just this time i dont need your help  *freak* *hihi*
yea im waiting for the unicorn guy ive attacked 12 times in 3 days to go on vac mode  *freak* *freak* .. and that unicorn member near you got pillaged by narsil  :hooray: so that stuffed him up a little


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: KoSaC on July 06, 2008, 12:20:21 PM
yea im waiting for the unicorn guy ive attacked 12 times in 3 days to go on vac mode  *freak* *freak* .. and that unicorn member near you got pillaged by narsil  :hooray: so that stuffed him up a little
i got 750 heavies and 5 rams   *freak* let the hunt begins  *freak*


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: smruti on July 09, 2008, 17:21:03 PM
i got 750 heavies and 5 rams   *freak* let the hunt begins  *freak*
OMG KoSac 750 heavies n 5 rams..cool..thats better than 749 heavies n 4 rams n is a record in r2..m gonna join the show soon. *gamer*


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: KoSaC on July 09, 2008, 19:30:09 PM
OMG KoSac 750 heavies n 5 rams..cool..thats better than 749 heavies n 4 rams n is a record in r2..m gonna join the show soon. *gamer*
it is more now  *freak*


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: realmlord2 on July 11, 2008, 09:45:20 AM
i will have more soon , if im lucky i will have 1500 heavy swords soon


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: worrior2008 on August 11, 2008, 02:27:42 AM
I think this is the biggest battle in io history and if it is not, it is maybe in top 5 of biggest battles.

By the way it is a 8 month old realm

http://statika.imperiaonline.org/imperia/game/_addons/dokladi/?path=bitki/11/2008_7_22/10005164_10004444_21812


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: xMoDx on August 11, 2008, 04:03:17 AM
I think this is the biggest battle in io history and if it is not, it is maybe in top 5 of biggest battles.

By the way it is a 8 month old realm

http://statika.imperiaonline.org/imperia/game/_addons/dokladi/?path=bitki/11/2008_7_22/10005164_10004444_21812

 *rose* all i can say is fantastic.... i really like bloodshed


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: realmlord2 on August 12, 2008, 00:26:20 AM
I think this is the biggest battle in io history and if it is not, it is maybe in top 5 of biggest battles.

By the way it is a 8 month old realm

http://statika.imperiaonline.org/imperia/game/_addons/dokladi/?path=bitki/11/2008_7_22/10005164_10004444_21812
awesome  *rose*


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: smruti on August 15, 2008, 12:26:57 PM
I think this is the biggest battle in io history and if it is not, it is maybe in top 5 of biggest battles.

By the way it is a 8 month old realm

http://statika.imperiaonline.org/imperia/game/_addons/dokladi/?path=bitki/11/2008_7_22/10005164_10004444_21812

thats really cool..its like beer coming from kitchen taps ..would u mind to tell how much mp u/whomever got for this battle  [:-} *gamer*


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: BeaZtiE on September 16, 2008, 15:53:44 PM
i keep my ratio.. :)
(http://img301.imageshack.us/img301/1450/ratiokx6.jpg)
13x damage.. :)
and.. i am a pacific player.. i am not this brutal bastard (yet)
out of time :(


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: bran360 on October 01, 2008, 18:36:40 PM
wow :o :o


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: bran360 on November 01, 2008, 04:36:00 AM
i think i hold the record for waiting he longest for a lvl 11 iron mine............74 hrs.....thats right just try beat me *hihi*


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: smruti on November 01, 2008, 10:36:16 AM
i think i hold the record for waiting he longest for a lvl 11 iron mine............74 hrs.....thats right just try beat me *hihi*

:head_hurts_kr: :head_hurts_kr: thats awful :)


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: vidomina on November 01, 2008, 21:46:29 PM
Put the new record more final in the empire   975264      :hooray:

(http://store.picbg.net/pubpic/1E/B9/a97391f7c4b01eb9.JPG)                                             :hard:


http://www4.imperiaonline.org/forums/bg/index.php?topic=9800.15                                                                                              *gamer*


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: tiger on November 01, 2008, 21:48:52 PM
What realm is that?


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: vidomina on November 01, 2008, 21:50:41 PM
http://www4.imperiaonline.org/forums/bg/index.php?topic=9979.0  realm 3 internacional    *gamer*  version 2  *heart* *heart* *heart*


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: tiger on November 01, 2008, 21:55:20 PM
Excelent, good job.
I guess it was posted sooner in bulgarian forum, because now another era will be almost over.


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: KoSaC on November 02, 2008, 15:37:14 PM
 *freak* Kj has record in made /deleted forum accounts  *freak*


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: k_mihai on November 02, 2008, 15:53:41 PM
*freak* Kj has record in made /deleted forum accounts  *freak*

and whining posts on forum. but i think that vidomina killed his army in r2, that battle he always shows :D

good job vidomina!


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: vidomina on November 02, 2008, 17:31:56 PM
 *rose*   I do not have notion what are the reports from my germ plazma v r2     :hard:   In your forum   
But the record will remain I With She makes ahead the things inaccessible :hooray:               975264                                              *gamer*




Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: kingjohn on November 02, 2008, 17:36:47 PM
*rose*I do not have notion what are the reports from my germ plazma v r2     :hard:   In your forum   
But the record will remain I With She makes ahead the things inaccessible :hooray:               975264                                              *gamer*




When I play IO again, I will try to make the 1,000,000 points barrier for the 4 months realm, 1.1 million, but no time to play, IO too much stress, so again no one has beaten your record yet for a 4 months realm.  *rose* *rose* *rose*


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: vidomina on November 02, 2008, 17:42:45 PM
It is inaccessible already Rules   ;D                                                                   *gamer*

http://www.vbox7.com/play:6423040b       *HI*                                    Greeting    [:-} [:-} [:-}                                  *gamer*


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: tiger on November 02, 2008, 17:59:39 PM
Well vidomina looks so cute on her pictures posted on forum so i wont try to take her record.  *rose* *rose* :)  Its better excuse then to say i dont have time.  *hihi* *hihi*


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: vidomina on November 02, 2008, 18:03:31 PM
Alive As well rich It will turn up for the time as well                         ;)                                                               *gamer*


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: KoSaC on November 02, 2008, 18:04:12 PM
When I play IO again, I will try to make the 1,000,000 points barrier for the 4 months realm, 1.1 million, but no time to play, IO too much stress, so again no one has beaten your record yet for a 4 months realm.  *rose* *rose* *rose*
*hahaha*
1, you were saying you would do it but you dont have skills,so you used excuses like oh my im being pillaged
2. remember that you got banned ingame  *freak* and since you wont be able to use proxies or you would get another ban   :head_hurts_kr: youll have to play with your own flag and thats just invite for peepz who hate you  *freak* i mean we found you with bulg flag ,what do you think how much is it gonna take time to find you with malaysia flag


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: k_mihai on November 02, 2008, 21:13:11 PM
*rose*   I do not have notion what are the reports from my germ plazma v r2     :hard:   In your forum   
But the record will remain I With She makes ahead the things inaccessible :hooray:               975264                                              *gamer*




he, he, anyway, good job for the record :)

*hahaha*
1, you were saying you would do it but you dont have skills,so you used excuses like oh my im being pillaged
2. remember that you got banned ingame  *freak* and since you wont be able to use proxies or you would get another ban   :head_hurts_kr: youll have to play with your own flag and thats just invite for peepz who hate you  *freak* i mean we found you with bulg flag ,what do you think how much is it gonna take time to find you with malaysia flag

he won`t do it, cause he`ll lose his army in a silly way like he did in all eras where he played and fell to 600 k :D



Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: gior15 on November 03, 2008, 00:45:33 AM
well in realm 25 aakylas has already 21 provs...(20 active one in research) and he will propably just make all 25 LOL.....


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: k_mihai on November 03, 2008, 01:23:36 AM
well in realm 25 aakylas has already 21 provs...(20 active one in research) and he will propably just make all 25 LOL.....

and u want to have the record in offensive defeats? :D


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: That Guy on November 04, 2008, 01:48:09 AM
and u want to have the record in offensive defeats? :D

Very clever.  We joke about that with Super G but I have to come to his defense here.  It's not a stat that really even matters on his page.  Not one of those is against a real enemy.  It's simply treb free casual farming. 

As for the important numbers.....   Going into the 11th month of the era, I don't believe a single player has ever successfully caught his army nor has he lost a single time attacking an active player with an actual army.  Not bad huh?  And he's number 1 in mil points.


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: xamlo on November 04, 2008, 16:37:21 PM
(http://www.picvalley.net/u/1189/1681982959.BMP) (http://www.picvalley.net/v.php?p=u/1189/1681982959.BMP)


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: Octavian on November 04, 2008, 16:45:55 PM
and u want to have the record in offensive defeats? :D

Hello Mihai :)

I think George is the greek brother of MC. They both push the goldmines with a vengeance  [:-}

And he could be a distant cousin of Kremena  :evil3:. I have never seen anyone so eager to kill since I played with her :)

Are you still playing R4 or R1 Mihai? Are any of the old gang around?



Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: Radooo on November 04, 2008, 18:11:10 PM
Are any of the old gang around?

I'm not *hihi*

(http://www.picvalley.net/u/1189/1681982959.BMP) (http://www.picvalley.net/v.php?p=u/1189/1681982959.BMP)

Please, somebody kill me *suicide*


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: gior15 on November 04, 2008, 21:24:16 PM
k_mihai...i updated my logo just for you...34 defeats...:)....can you beat that?.... *hihi* *hihi* *hahaha* *hahaha*


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: k_mihai on November 05, 2008, 02:29:20 AM
Very clever.  We joke about that with Super G but I have to come to his defense here.  It's not a stat that really even matters on his page.  Not one of those is against a real enemy.  It's simply treb free casual farming. 

As for the important numbers.....   Going into the 11th month of the era, I don't believe a single player has ever successfully caught his army nor has he lost a single time attacking an active player with an actual army.  Not bad huh?  And he's number 1 in mil points.

it always matters

Hello Mihai :)

I think George is the greek brother of MC. They both push the goldmines with a vengeance  [:-}

And he could be a distant cousin of Kremena  :evil3:. I have never seen anyone so eager to kill since I played with her :)

Are you still playing R4 or R1 Mihai? Are any of the old gang around?



he, he, soo, is kept in family :D i`m in an IO break now. how r u?

k_mihai...i updated my logo just for you...34 defeats...:)....can you beat that?.... *hihi* *hihi* *hahaha* *hahaha*

nope :D


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: That Guy on November 15, 2008, 12:10:04 PM
I don't know where this ranks in the history of IO wars but this was definitely one of the most impressive I've seen in terms of overall military points...

Ukko_Wing     GRIGAL    72235   36554   2008-11-08 00:45:02   2008-11-15 00:45:02

That's a whole lotta WAR!   *guns*


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: Radooo on November 15, 2008, 15:53:10 PM
I don't know where this ranks in the history of IO wars but this was definitely one of the most impressive I've seen in terms of overall military points...

Ukko_Wing     GRIGAL    72235   36554   2008-11-08 00:45:02   2008-11-15 00:45:02

That's a whole lotta WAR!   *guns*

this is a 8 month realm. There was a war with more than 40k mily points for both alliances in 4 months realm *pardon*


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: KoSaC on November 15, 2008, 16:35:16 PM
this is a 8 month realm. There was a war with more than 40k mily points for both alliances in 4 months realm *pardon*
remember that fixed war in r10?  *freak*


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: Radooo on November 15, 2008, 19:38:52 PM
remember that fixed war in r10?  *freak*

r10 is a special realm...there you can't have army saves so it's easy to kill armies


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: KoSaC on November 16, 2008, 13:36:55 PM
r10 is a special realm...there you can't have army saves so it's easy to kill armies
*freak*and not so easy to rebuild them  *freak*


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: xMoDx on December 26, 2008, 10:48:01 AM
does anyone have Garrison maximum record? who got the most highest garrisoned troops?  *gamer* *gamer*


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: enkhuush on December 28, 2008, 09:37:16 AM
How about super fast getting medal, unless someone already submitted in this category.

Here it is. Day 5 of realm4 era6(?).

(http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3281/3143687360_bd79c80b72.jpg?v=0)


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: Xpertiza on December 28, 2008, 10:01:45 AM
i got 2 , 3-rd day, r4 this era  *freak*


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: tiger on December 28, 2008, 11:41:00 AM
I got 7 medals at day 3 R2 last era.  *ice* :P


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: KoSaC on December 28, 2008, 12:51:26 PM
I got 7 medals at day 3 R2 last era.  *ice* :P
:rant: and mascot got 5 or 6  :rant: :rant: :rant: with players like you i never had a chance of getting medal,though i killed some army at day 4  :rant:


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: Radooo on December 28, 2008, 12:53:01 PM
the earliest day you can get a medal is day 3, not day 5 *pardon*


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: KoSaC on December 28, 2008, 13:00:44 PM
oh i have question for interesting record,not related to the game,but forum  *tired*. whats the biggest number of private messages 1 person ever had (not including admins because they get bugs complains etc.)
i personaly got 63 pages  *freak*


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: Hiske on December 28, 2008, 15:21:03 PM
oh i have question for interesting record,not related to the game,but forum  *tired*. whats the biggest number of private messages 1 person ever had (not including admins because they get bugs complains etc.)
i personaly got 63 pages  *freak*

I have 144 pages; but deleted at least 100 pages already :)


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: KoSaC on December 28, 2008, 15:22:03 PM
I have 144 pages; but deleted at least 100 pages already :)
:rant: then i need to continue with hard work and for a year or so ill beat you  *freak*


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: Radooo on December 28, 2008, 16:20:12 PM
I have 144 pages; but deleted at least 100 pages already :)

you were a badger...so it doesn't count *rose*


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: vidomina on December 30, 2008, 11:49:38 AM
http://www4.imperiaonline.org/forums/bg/index.php?topic=117.360        
something worthy of respect !!!      :hard:


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: tiger on December 30, 2008, 12:15:41 PM
In realms 1 year long, it isnt any big problem to do it. Yes its worth of respect but 1 year long realms started this year and next year when they finish it will be a lot of such records. :)

By the way i im certain that i own record in highest negative gold in province. I was over 2 000 000 000 minus gold in main prov and after that counter jumped in positive value and now i am back on - 38 000 000.  :)


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: That Guy on December 30, 2008, 20:18:28 PM
In realms 1 year long, it isnt any big problem to do it. Yes its worth of respect but 1 year long realms started this year and next year when they finish it will be a lot of such records. :)

By the way i im certain that i own record in highest negative gold in province. I was over 2 000 000 000 minus gold in main prov and after that counter jumped in positive value and now i am back on - 38 000 000.  :)

It must be a big problem to do it.  There's only one person, aakylas, that I've ever heard of colonizing 25 provinces.  As for Georged, he's the only one with over 500k mil points in that same year long realm and will possibly get over 600k by the end.  This was a Realm (25) with massive constant wars and some great players.  With all that action and talent, he's the only one at that level. 

Amazing records can certainly be set in year long realms but they are still amazing and far from easy. 


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: tiger on December 30, 2008, 20:27:21 PM
Realm 25 is on of first which is 1 year long i think. Others will end 2 or more months after R25 so people have still a lot to play.  I didnt say it was easy, but if good player set that for his goal, it shouldnt be so hard to achieve. It wasnt my intention to say it isnt achievement, but to point it isnt so impossible mission as it looks. But most of guys when they got decent economy, start killing not continue to 25 provinces.
And amazing is even to play 1 year without stop.


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: gior15 on January 09, 2009, 16:03:33 PM
small war secreats...LOL...the maximum cart lvl is 14 or is it not...?,,,,hehehe

(http://img80.imageshack.us/img80/7640/cartory7.png)


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: That Guy on January 10, 2009, 01:26:09 AM
LOL George!  I was wondering how long you would hold back sharing that little nugget of info.  Must have been eating you up inside.  All those players chasing you were so certain they had you nailed.  If only they had known your sandals had wings.   *hahaha*


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: Xpertiza on January 10, 2009, 04:06:34 AM
LOL George!  I was wondering how long you would hold back sharing that little nugget of info.  Must have been eating you up inside.  All those players chasing you were so certain they had you nailed.  If only they had known your sandals had wings.   *hahaha*
haha, don`t worry, there`s no sugar


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: That Guy on January 10, 2009, 05:34:22 AM
Geez dude... not quite where I expected that to go... where's your head?  Maybe we could be less childish if I said they 'march expeditiously'.


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: ROYKED on March 02, 2009, 14:18:23 PM
Well i think our alliance (realm 38) achieved those recorders in our last war -

1. Most points achieved in single war (127,781) 2. Most differentiation points achieved by winning side as opposed to loosing side (117,700) 3. All points achieved by offensive attacks without any defensive victory. 4. Most net points taken out from loosing alliance - 1,867,701.

http://tinypic.com/view.php?pic=2dslll4&s=5


If u are wondering loosing alliance had 9 members (only 6 of them in alliance range) and it wasn't a fix war (i have enough "hate" msgs i got from the leader of loosing alliance to show for it). we just worked really hard and didn't lose any field/siege battle with armies.


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: KoSaC on March 04, 2009, 10:29:32 AM
price of iron in croatian realm is 49  *hahaha*  *freak*


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: HerrSchultze on April 05, 2009, 09:42:54 AM
i would like to have a record, even if it is times burned  *freak*


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: KoSaC on April 05, 2009, 10:34:44 AM
i would like to have a record, even if it is times burned  *freak*
record for that was over 1000 if i recall  *freak*


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: HerrSchultze on April 05, 2009, 10:35:43 AM
record for that was over 1000 if i recall  *freak*
ouch!!!! :head_hurts_kr: the guy didn't quit? omfg!! i guiess mines don't count, poor fella he's fubar xD


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: KoSaC on April 05, 2009, 10:36:34 AM
ouch!!!! :head_hurts_kr: the guy didn't quit? omfg!! i guiess mines don't count, poor fella he's fubar xD
im not exactly sure,but there was 1 greek saying he got that record..farmer from r10 i think  *freak*


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: Star Blade on April 21, 2009, 20:53:00 PM
I think this battle is one of the biggest battle in IO (i think biggest...)

http://statika.imperiaonline.org/imperia/game/_addons/dokladi/?path=bitki/40/2009_4_20/40003394_40008117_383409

 :o :o :o *freak* *freak* *freak*

I am some kind of weteran to this game but this 2 guys even for me are really...  "*freak*"


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: Polymeron on April 21, 2009, 21:24:23 PM
I think this battle is one of the biggest battle in IO (i think biggest...)

http://statika.imperiaonline.org/imperia/game/_addons/dokladi/?path=bitki/40/2009_4_20/40003394_40008117_383409

 :o :o :o *freak* *freak* *freak*

I am some kind of weteran to this game but this 2 guys even for me are really...  "*freak*"

Holy cow! That has to be a record!
I also never saw morale over 150, not to mention 200. They have more fighting spirit than Mony's Sarans...


Please, somebody kill me *suicide*
/me kills Radooo  *freak*



Hmm, I'm not sure I ever broke any record in IO. Except, maybe this counts?

(http://img98.imageshack.us/img98/5141/97419725.jpg)

Help  *sos*


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: KoSaC on April 21, 2009, 21:27:45 PM
Holy cow! That has to be a record!
I also never saw morale over 150, not to mention 200. They have more fighting spirit than Mony's Sarans...

/me kills Radooo  *freak*



Hmm, I'm not sure I ever broke any record in IO. Except, maybe this counts?

(http://img98.imageshack.us/img98/5141/97419725.jpg)

Help  *sos*
Total time logged in : 33 days, 22 hours i 30 minutes. )) and in this,makatas holds a record  *freak*


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: Star Blade on April 21, 2009, 21:28:10 PM

Hmm, I'm not sure I ever broke any record in IO. Except, maybe this counts?

(http://img98.imageshack.us/img98/5141/97419725.jpg)

Help  *sos*
Nah - on polish forum I have:

Czas zalogowania w sumie: 19 dni, 13 godz. 52 min. - and there is person who have 3 times more then me *black_eye*

DeathVenom 66d 2g 51m  *freak*

We should be called forum addicts i think - nothing to brag about *freak*


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: Polymeron on April 21, 2009, 21:29:30 PM
You mistook my meaning. If I wanted to brag about online time, I'd maybe bring up my GW time, I burned more than a month of my life on that forum  *freak*


No, look a little lower than that... ;)


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: Starbuck on April 21, 2009, 21:30:46 PM
(http://i88.servimg.com/u/f88/11/88/09/55/io_for10.jpg) (http://www.servimg.com/image_preview.php?i=180&u=11880955)

you were saying ?
I think that Radooo is even worse ....  *freak*


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: Star Blade on April 21, 2009, 21:41:38 PM
Oki - 340 pages of unread posts... *hihi*


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: Polymeron on April 21, 2009, 21:45:03 PM
Oki - 340 pages of unread posts... *hihi*

Yep. I think I have the highest unread topics for an active member of the forum... Hard to measure that though, maybe if you multiply unread topics by post count? *SCRATCH*


I'll take any statistic at this point *pardon*


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: Star Blade on April 21, 2009, 21:46:29 PM
Yep. I think I have the highest unread topics for an active member of the forum... Hard to measure that though, maybe if you multiply unread topics by post count? *SCRATCH*


I'll take any statistic at this point *pardon*

I was almost complitely absend on this forum for more then 1 year so I think i might have more... *freak*


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: Radooo on April 21, 2009, 23:30:54 PM
(http://i88.servimg.com/u/f88/11/88/09/55/io_for10.jpg) (http://www.servimg.com/image_preview.php?i=180&u=11880955)

you were saying ?
I think that Radooo is even worse ....  *freak*

Total time logged in: 53 days, 1 hours and 36 minutes  *freak*


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: stud on April 21, 2009, 23:35:28 PM
u guys suck, i have 47 days, 13 hours and 11 min, and i was away for like 8 months or even more :D *freak*


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: Starbuck on April 22, 2009, 17:58:47 PM
Total time logged in: 119 days, 17 hours and 6 minutes.

 *freak*

that's past the addiction level .... Makatas is an entity born out of the Forum  *freak* *hahaha*


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: HerrSchultze on April 22, 2009, 22:06:17 PM
15 days 7 h  *freak* *freak* *freak* *hihi*


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: isolde on April 22, 2009, 22:20:55 PM
that's past the addiction level .... Makatas is an entity born out of the Forum  *freak* *hahaha*

He cheats ! I suspect he is refreshing all night with the forum open to fake online activity !!!


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: alhatal on April 25, 2009, 15:10:35 PM
i have 2 days 13 hours... ???


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: andy_eu on April 27, 2009, 12:03:20 PM
This should be a record:
17 medals won in one day in R4 (by 6 different players)


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: chegewara on April 27, 2009, 12:04:59 PM
This should be a record:
17 medals won in one day in R4 (by 6 different players)
and without one battle? *cool*


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: Radooo on April 27, 2009, 13:16:34 PM
and without one battle? *cool*

there were 17 battles...just no casualties *freak*


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: chegewara on April 27, 2009, 13:22:05 PM
you mean this medals  *xxx*
(http://img411.imageshack.us/img411/853/medals.jpg)


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: Radooo on April 27, 2009, 14:40:57 PM
you mean this medals  *xxx*
(http://img411.imageshack.us/img411/853/medals.jpg)

yes :hooray:


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: gharn on April 27, 2009, 19:05:27 PM
:) congratulations so far:)))) every day is giving me new point of view here and I see that I am really a noob here:)

so this means you don't have to show so much effort to gain a medal:)

I haven't got any medals last era although I had so many bloody battles...really amazing:)


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: Radooo on April 27, 2009, 19:37:33 PM
:) congratulations so far:)))) every day is giving me new point of view here and I see that I am really a noob here:)

so this means you don't have to show so much effort to gain a medal:)

I haven't got any medals last era although I had so many bloody battles...really amazing:)

bloody battles? When people have 300k points, losing 10k points in a battle isn't bloody *freak*


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: gharn on April 27, 2009, 19:45:35 PM
hahaha:))

I am ofcourse talking about my league mate:))) 300 k is far more beyond my wildest dreams:))

I never have too much medals..because I try not to loose so many men at the battlefield:) calculation is important..but I am really shocked by that medals because I haven't thought that it is so easy..

this is not a critisism..this is what confused me :)


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: Radooo on April 27, 2009, 20:08:46 PM
you can take medals without losing anything (in the first 4 weeks of the game) and you can take medals with very few losses...that's not an excuse *freak*


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: gharn on April 27, 2009, 20:34:02 PM
well..pls inform me if you get some:)) because medals are given to the battles in which both the attacker and the defense looses the most at the same time through  all the battles in a day...at least it was like that..if it is changed  I am still unsuccesfull in getting medals:)))))))))))

I always see medals as miscalculation or the battles with unnecessary( or so assential in a war esp) risks :) and I am not sad because of having no or few medals because of this :)

but this does not mean that I don't appreciate the ones who get some:) I just don't earn it easily..that's all:)


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: V-Bramm on May 03, 2009, 00:30:20 AM
hmm whats the lowest honor someone ever got?


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: fragmaster on May 03, 2009, 00:35:24 AM
thats not achivement ,u can send attacks outside 2x and recall and have -10000 in one day easily


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: V-Bramm on May 03, 2009, 00:37:33 AM
thats not achivement ,u can send attacks outside 2x and recall and have -10000 in one day easily

with pillages only...if that makes a difference ^^?
so infact, most pillages...


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: fragmaster on May 03, 2009, 00:42:06 AM
u cant beat Kosac  *freak*,find another category  *pardon*


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: V-Bramm on May 03, 2009, 00:45:50 AM
u cant beat Kosac  *freak*,find another category  *pardon*
lol....id like proof on that ;]


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: fragmaster on May 03, 2009, 00:54:01 AM
ask him ,im sure he has some nice photos  *ok*


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: HerrSchultze on May 03, 2009, 01:26:42 AM
 *hahaha* *hahaha* *hahaha* *hahaha* he even can pillage the chat room  *freak* *freak*

no wonder his name is Mr Pillage  *freak*


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: KoSaC on May 03, 2009, 08:20:54 AM
i had some links to very nice battles but i lost them  *crazy*  best i did was battle with starting morale of 30  :hard: though i couldve made it with negative if i attacked ally who is barely in 3x range  *gamer*  *freak*


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: HerrSchultze on May 03, 2009, 10:24:11 AM
As far as I know, this is the record.

http://www4.imperiaonline.org/forums/int/index.php?topic=601.msg74182#msg74182
If I remember well, starting morale of -60.
:o :o amazing radoo  *freak* *freak* *freak* if we multiply those 1500 by 10000 villagers at elast per pillage ........ :head_hurts_kr:  :head_hurts_kr: :head_hurts_kr: omg!!!! 15,000,000  *xxx* *xxx* *xxx* *xxx* *xxx* *xxx* *xxx* OMFG!!!! STAY AWAY FROM ME!!!! or on my side  *freak* *freak*


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: V-Bramm on May 03, 2009, 12:28:47 PM
damn looks impressive ^^
but how stupid is it actually that killed villagers dont get recorded in that militairy menu ??
I think that should be nice -,-


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: KoSaC on May 03, 2009, 13:44:16 PM
As far as I know, this is the record.

http://www4.imperiaonline.org/forums/int/index.php?topic=601.msg74182#msg74182
If I remember well, starting morale of -60.
nope :) you showed me battle with starting morale of -167 if i recall right   *freak*  *sos* *sos*
thats why i turned to pillaging  *rose*


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: HerrSchultze on May 04, 2009, 05:54:22 AM
nope :) you showed me battle with starting morale of -167 if i recall right   *freak*  *sos* *sos*
thats why i turned to pillaging  *rose*
MAKATAS WHAT HAVE YOU DONE!!!!! :o :o :o

YOU PERVERTED THIS SWEET KID"S MIND!!!! :head_hurts_kr: :head_hurts_kr: *stop* *stop*


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: KoSaC on May 04, 2009, 06:58:10 AM
Maybe, I dont remember  *hihi*
it must be,you had -5k honor..  *freak*


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: HerrSchultze on May 04, 2009, 07:12:34 AM
it must be,you had -5k honor..  *freak*
but that would only give - 100 morale :head_hurts_kr: :head_hurts_kr:

and the other 67?  *pardon*


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: fragmaster on May 04, 2009, 07:18:34 AM
well its not -2 moral per 100 negative honor ,its -5 moral per 100 negative honor.so -5x50=-250 .And 110-250 =  -140.


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: HerrSchultze on May 04, 2009, 08:08:53 AM
well its not -2 moral per 100 negative honor ,its -5 moral per 100 negative honor.so -5x50=-250 .And 110-250 =  -140.
where did  i get such an idea then?  *crazy* *xxx* *pardon*


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: isolde on May 04, 2009, 10:01:59 AM
where did  i get such an idea then?  *crazy* *xxx* *pardon*

you probably got the idea because it is +2 moral for 100 positive honor, but the penalty for - honor is much greater  :evil4:


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: KoSaC on May 04, 2009, 13:10:55 PM
well its not -2 moral per 100 negative honor ,its -5 moral per 100 negative honor.so -5x50=-250 .And 110-250 =  -140.
yes..and he prolly had high tactics lvl but attacked boxed province of a dude who is barely in his 3x :D  *freak* *freak*
my idol  *heart*


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: isolde on May 04, 2009, 13:47:25 PM
yes..and he prolly had high tactics lvl but attacked boxed province of a dude who is barely in his 3x :D  *freak* *freak*
my idol  *heart*

I will never reach his heights as a pillager :D Already my third attempt I sent fortress siege by mistake instead of pillage  *freak*  Some people never learn  *black_eye*


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: Kirania on May 07, 2009, 07:22:51 AM
 :o :o :o :o

WOW! You losers are still at it  *crazy*

And, now Isolde is FORUM STAFF ?!?!   :head_hurts_kr:

Btw, greetings to all long lost friends
 :evil3:



Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: tiger on July 18, 2009, 10:53:35 AM
Its not about pillages, but i guess i could be every pillagers dream.

I just managed to colonize all 25 province  on day 177 of realm in R71.  *hihi*


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: KoSaC on July 18, 2009, 12:46:44 PM
Its not about pillages, but i guess i could be every pillagers dream.

I just managed to colonize all 25 province  on day 177 of realm in R71.  *hihi*
gratz.. *freak* *freak* *freak*


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: Hiske on July 19, 2009, 10:33:13 AM
Its not about pillages, but i guess i could be every pillagers dream.

I just managed to colonize all 25 province  on day 177 of realm in R71.  *hihi*

:o :o :o :o :o


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: tiger on July 19, 2009, 14:02:33 PM
Military academy 25...hmmm     *freak*
mil academy 4 is enough. You can launch only 4 pillages per day. :)


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: KoSaC on July 19, 2009, 14:20:33 PM
yeah :(


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: fragmaster on July 19, 2009, 20:53:49 PM
Its not about pillages, but i guess i could be every pillagers dream.

I just managed to colonize all 25 province  on day 177 of realm in R71.  *hihi*

 *freak* *freak* *freak* tiger is sick. I think if u manage to have 0 players in 2x range that would be cool :)


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: savannah on July 19, 2009, 23:27:02 PM
no! who would you steal golds from? *freak*


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: zmeio on July 19, 2009, 23:29:49 PM
From noone .. he will just farming :D


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: smruti on July 20, 2009, 02:47:39 AM
Its not about pillages, but i guess i could be every pillagers dream.

I just managed to colonize all 25 province  on day 177 of realm in R71.  *hihi*

 *bravo* *bravo* i just saw u top in networth few days ago  *rose*


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: tiger on July 20, 2009, 08:16:04 AM
*freak* *freak* *freak* tiger is sick. I think if u manage to have 0 players in 2x range that would be cool :)
Well i have 1 player in 2x for now. :) But in later stages you cant grow so fast that others wont grow atleast with half, so they catch up. :)


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: fragmaster on August 12, 2009, 01:51:24 AM
Well i have 1 player in 2x for now. :) But in later stages you cant grow so fast that others wont grow atleast with half, so they catch up. :)
yes u can ,just buff researches ,if u have greater univ u can build with greater speed ,even if its meaningless researches.just rotate capitol ,and make univ 100.


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: KoSaC on August 12, 2009, 01:57:35 AM
yes u can ,just buff researches ,if u have greater univ u can build with greater speed ,even if its meaningless researches.just rotate capitol ,and make univ 100.
*freak* *freak* *freak*


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: HELLyeah on August 25, 2009, 15:11:03 PM
yes u can ,just buff researches ,if u have greater univ u can build with greater speed ,even if its meaningless researches.just rotate capitol ,and make univ 100.

Wave your Magic wand xD  *OldMAn*


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: HRdevil on September 15, 2009, 07:55:55 AM
*OldMAn*


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: Afanancio on October 01, 2009, 18:40:41 PM
 *rose* For Radooo ....you first !!!!!!!!!  *hahaha*    i second !!!!!!!!!!!    :hard: 
                                    *gamer*                     
(http://img267.imageshack.us/img267/4171/afanancio.jpg)
                                          *pardon*


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: HerrSchultze on October 04, 2009, 02:31:25 AM
*rose* For Radooo ....you first !!!!!!!!!  *hahaha*    i second !!!!!!!!!!!    :hard: 
                                    *gamer*                     
(http://img267.imageshack.us/img267/4171/afanancio.jpg)
                                          *pardon*

i want too!!!!!! :rant:


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: mradam101 on October 04, 2009, 11:01:08 AM
*rose* For Radooo ....you first !!!!!!!!!  *hahaha*    i second !!!!!!!!!!!    :hard: 
                                    *gamer*                     
(http://img267.imageshack.us/img267/4171/afanancio.jpg)
                                          *pardon*


Haha nice job.


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: fapo on October 04, 2009, 22:55:20 PM
a monsterr  *bravo* *bravo*  http://www16.imperiaonline.org/imperia/game/top20.php?tip=&c=&sort=2&realm=49  and his batles http://www17.imperiaonline.org/imperia/game_v4a/_addons/dokladi/?path=bitki/49/2009_9_7/49000039_49030342_8776  incredibly  *xxx* *xxx*


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: zmeio on October 04, 2009, 23:04:10 PM
And he`s deleted long ago ... goddamned cheater  :evil4:


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: HerrSchultze on October 04, 2009, 23:56:59 PM
a monsterr  *bravo* *bravo*  http://www16.imperiaonline.org/imperia/game/top20.php?tip=&c=&sort=2&realm=49  and his batles http://www17.imperiaonline.org/imperia/game_v4a/_addons/dokladi/?path=bitki/49/2009_9_7/49000039_49030342_8776  incredibly  *xxx* *xxx*
hey fapo watcha doing in here? *freak*


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: fapo on October 06, 2009, 00:21:55 AM
hey fapo watcha doing in here? *freak*

i´m in anywheare


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: HerrSchultze on October 06, 2009, 22:06:34 PM
i´m in anywheare
okis buddy  *freak*


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: maeof on December 28, 2009, 20:35:57 PM
Anyway nice record  *rose*


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: KoSaC on December 28, 2009, 20:51:32 PM
a monsterr  *bravo* *bravo*  http://www16.imperiaonline.org/imperia/game/top20.php?tip=&c=&sort=2&realm=49  and his batles http://www17.imperiaonline.org/imperia/game_v4a/_addons/dokladi/?path=bitki/49/2009_9_7/49000039_49030342_8776  incredibly  *xxx* *xxx*
O.o damn sooo much honor..blah...farmers


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: maeof on December 28, 2009, 20:52:17 PM
Agree


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: HRdevil on December 30, 2009, 21:57:20 PM
Long time no records  *SEARCH*


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: maeof on December 30, 2009, 22:21:10 PM
this topic is just for all time record


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: HerrSchultze on December 31, 2009, 01:26:25 AM
ths topicis for all time spammers *freak*


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: fragmaster on January 08, 2010, 14:55:11 PM
guys u dont have to corrupt every game topic?


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: HerrSchultze on January 08, 2010, 22:24:54 PM
guys u dont have to corrupt every game topic?
is that an affirmation or aquestion? *freak*


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: Kopator on May 25, 2010, 02:07:18 AM
is that an affirmation or aquestion? *freak*

no answer ... yet  *freak*


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: Imperia-Judith on May 25, 2010, 10:05:23 AM
guys u dont have to corrupt every game topic?

+1..  *tired*


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: Moonshadow on May 25, 2010, 14:59:55 PM
It is not corruption but reincarnation  *freak*


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: KOPSi on July 27, 2010, 04:02:49 AM
In the name of record!

before 5,6 years in old chat while i was spamzor freak i spammed for 1h and 14 min same word (ctrl+v)

spamz record or insanity ?  *freak*


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: Kopator on July 27, 2010, 05:25:19 AM
In the name of record!

before 5,6 years in old chat while i was spamzor freak i spammed for 1h and 14 min same word (ctrl+v)

spamz record or insanity ?  *freak*

spam record  *rose*

but

6 years and still here = insanity  *xxx*
:P
 *freak*


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: numpty on October 14, 2010, 22:58:04 PM
ive also been here for 6 years, off and on, and i never lost to kopsi, always whooped his ass....hehehehe

and i am de granary master, so good that they had to remove granaries from version 5 for fear that I would again own this record and as a direct consequence spam krum and oton until they banned me for ficticious cheating...


Title: Wriggle cultivated not far from VIAGRA
Post by: homEmbess on February 28, 2011, 07:57:41 AM
buy viagra online (http://buyingviagras.mediaplace.biz/) reach-me-down to beatific erection problems in men.


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: Sheremetev on February 28, 2011, 08:51:32 AM
Using viagra in the name of the record?! *hahaha*


P.S: Sometimes I think Mewh is behind those bots- almost each of them gives us a really nice reason to spam in stickies.


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: maeof on February 28, 2011, 10:08:17 AM
I would never spam in stickies in other body, stop it *hahaha* *freak*


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: Sheremetev on February 28, 2011, 18:21:28 PM
Yeah, and Numpty wishes all the best for his cat...


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: maeof on February 28, 2011, 18:48:48 PM
and his pecker.


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: Kopator on March 02, 2011, 17:43:37 PM
and his pecker.

sad story... his pecker froze off in last snow storm....
 *hmm*
 *freak*


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: maeof on March 02, 2011, 19:18:22 PM
BLIZZARD FTW  *freak*


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: Kopator on March 03, 2011, 20:41:42 PM
BLIZZARD FTW  *freak*

they can be really bad in california  *freak*


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: maeof on March 03, 2011, 20:48:13 PM
oh yah course :D


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: Kopator on March 03, 2011, 20:49:44 PM
oh yah course :D

raining fire and snow
 *freak*


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: maeof on March 03, 2011, 20:50:13 PM
raining balls and chuck norris brain cells  *freak*

Norris sounds like a cat :DD


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: HerrSchultze on May 02, 2011, 13:33:28 PM
166 days away from spam record *freak* *freak* *freak* *freak* *freak*


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: Kopator on May 19, 2011, 10:59:16 AM
166 days away from spam record *freak* *freak* *freak* *freak* *freak*

back to private
 *freak*


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: beicumine on January 06, 2012, 23:23:00 PM
i killed in realm 5 24monhs ago much more like 14 millions enem soldiers killed   *rose* cheers old friends  :hard:


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: KoSaC on May 14, 2012, 23:39:53 PM
I'd like to ask (if anyone is alive ) whats the record of simultaneously capitulated players to 1 player..for example im messing around and i currently have 5 people capitulating from me (and its a blitz realm  *hahaha* *hahaha* *hahaha* ) so yeah i wanna know what was the biggest number of players that capitulated to someone at same time so i can compete against it *freak*


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: Koramae on May 15, 2012, 00:12:36 AM
You`re so mean  *GIRL_CRY* I wanna be that mean too, I can`t remember if anyone ever capitulated from me  *Angry*


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: KoSaC on May 15, 2012, 01:01:59 AM
You`re so mean  *GIRL_CRY* I wanna be that mean too, I can`t remember if anyone ever capitulated from me  *Angry*
*freak* join me in r15 next era and we will teach you our ways  *freak* btw in the morning if they're sissies i might have 7-9 people capitulated from me  *freak* *freak* *freak* *freak* but i doubt it *black_eye*


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: NeverGiveUp on May 15, 2012, 14:46:50 PM
Still spamming YA!!! [:-}


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: Koramae on May 15, 2012, 23:50:39 PM
*freak* join me in r15 next era and we will teach you our ways  *freak* btw in the morning if they're sissies i might have 7-9 people capitulated from me  *freak* *freak* *freak* *freak* but i doubt it *black_eye*
When is the next era?  :evil3:
Still spamming YA!!! [:-}
You think this is spam?  *freak* *freak*


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: KoSaC on May 15, 2012, 23:54:02 PM
I'm not sure  *hihi* I'll tell you few days before it starts  *freak*


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: NeverGiveUp on May 16, 2012, 08:45:14 AM
You`re so mean  *GIRL_CRY* I wanna be that mean too, I can`t remember if anyone ever capitulated from me  *Angry*

u can be my official baby sitter :D


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: Koramae on May 16, 2012, 11:49:13 AM
u can be my official baby sitter :D
As long as I can do anything I want with your account  *GIRL_CRAZY*


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: NeverGiveUp on May 16, 2012, 12:30:01 PM
As long as I can do anything I want with your account  *GIRL_CRAZY*

 :evil3: nope..i need my privacy..explicitly u can't touch my weed farms :D


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: Koramae on May 16, 2012, 21:43:00 PM
I promise I won`t touch them! I`ll order my most trusted smokers to do so  *freak*


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: Kopator on June 11, 2012, 07:44:59 AM
I promise I won`t touch them! I`ll order my most trusted smokers to do so  *freak*

finally learned 1pt... well done! ;)

 *freak*


Title: Re: In the name of the record
Post by: Koramae on June 11, 2012, 21:09:31 PM
finally learned 1pt... well done! ;)

 *freak*

Finally?  *Angry* I knew it since before this forum *Angry* *Angry*