Imperia Online International

IO - Classic and Version 4 Realms => Strategy => Topic started by: Rakii on November 13, 2007, 13:34:47 PM



Title: The Low Point Strategy - discussion
Post by: Rakii on November 13, 2007, 13:34:47 PM
to maintain my low point strategy , what do you suggest as my maximum population on my surrounding provinces before i have my level 7 fort?


Title: The Low Point Strategy - discussion
Post by: k_mihai on November 13, 2007, 14:08:47 PM
is in the strategy. i played with it last era in r7

u need 5 provinces, the 2nd one being the boxed mountain, or mountain with forest. all ur other provinces should have capped the population around 20 k villagers. their function is to give u the walled province advantage (-20 morale for the attacker), recruiting grounds for units, but they are not ur economy. Ur economy are ur neighbors, and the mountain provinces (after u got the lv 7 fort, mostly)

uneed to have big depots, maximum 4 k networth and to farm ur neighbors until u reach the 4 + millions GE necessary for a lv 7 fort. 


Title: The Low Point Strategy - discussion
Post by: Rakii on November 13, 2007, 14:54:12 PM
im trying to do this strategy now in realm 2, i already have my second province with archers inside with less than 100 points. its great.

About my question, you know that putting high level of farm makes your points level up too. Thats why im asking, I can make so much population after i reach my level 7 fort, but i want to prove if i really can make level 7 fort with less than 10k. (im trying to make this happen in shorter time unlike you have stated)

Im following all the instruction above including the armies and researches.


Title: The Low Point Strategy - discussion
Post by: k_mihai on November 13, 2007, 15:06:30 PM
stop ur farms at level 9, in all provinces, except the mountain boxed one. otherwise, u will grow too much, and lose the low point protection. that`s true also for granaries.

the logic of growth in IO now is population dependent, which means, the more people u have, the more u will grow. that`s why, in low point, who is an anti-growth strategy, population needs to be limited.


Title: The Low Point Strategy - discussion
Post by: Rakii on November 13, 2007, 15:27:13 PM
tnx for the reply.


Title: The Low Point Strategy - discussion
Post by: k_mihai on November 13, 2007, 15:28:15 PM
u`re welcome


Title: The Low Point Strategy - discussion
Post by: Ruskiy on January 07, 2008, 08:28:32 AM
Realm 25: if centrelization cost is increased to 30k wood, 2k iron, 20k stone, and 58k gold is this strategy useless? or can it be modified?


Title: The Low Point Strategy - discussion
Post by: Polymeron on January 07, 2008, 12:04:21 PM
That's a good question... I know that in GI the defenses are still good enough to warrant it, but I think the (initial) higher costs of Centralization break a lot of the merit of this strategy  *hmm*


Title: The Low Point Strategy - discussion
Post by: k_mihai on January 07, 2008, 12:10:11 PM
it`s still possible http://www4.imperiaonline.org/forums/int/index.php?topic=2529.0


Title: The Low Point Strategy - discussion
Post by: Rabain on January 08, 2008, 04:13:50 AM
What are good ways to reduce points at little cost...apart from disbanding troops?


Title: The Low Point Strategy - discussion
Post by: Radooo on January 08, 2008, 14:24:19 PM
You can only reduce points by disbanding troops :P


Title: The Low Point Strategy - discussion
Post by: makavelis on January 08, 2008, 14:37:41 PM
nice strategy ... i should use this in the  future one time  *bravo*


Title: The Low Point Strategy - discussion
Post by: Rabain on January 08, 2008, 15:08:35 PM
Gah...I'm not quite ready to hit that 15000 watershed just yet.

Oh well...no choice now.


Title: The Low Point Strategy - discussion
Post by: bolin on January 20, 2008, 00:22:40 AM
 :D LOL, I did a much better strategy accidentally *pardon*, I thought I would never again play imperia,  left and i donnow how much time i left and came back, i had 1 mil, wood and 200000 iron  *YAHOO* *YAHOO* *YAHOO*


Title: The Low Point Strategy - discussion
Post by: Foundation on January 20, 2008, 03:24:41 AM
But you had to have had low points & a high fort or ppl would have taken that, right?


Title: The Low Point Strategy - discussion
Post by: Foundation on January 20, 2008, 03:39:13 AM
If I may make a suggestion about the research for a LPS, the uni and arch levels do not necessarily have to stay at 5 as you get higher and higher fort levels.

When you begin to construct, or think about constructing, level 5+ fortresses, first calculate how much building one level of uni and one level of arc will raise your points by, and then calculate how much slack that'll cut for your points through arch lowering the cost of the next fort.

I found that building 8 lvls of uni and arch is still making the exchange of points favourable to the player building the research against players just building the fort at 5&5, not to mention how much time that'll save and resources on other buildings. :)

Just another thought, hope it helps,

Foundation


Title: The Low Point Strategy - discussion
Post by: Radooo on January 20, 2008, 13:09:20 PM
When you play low point strategy, resources aren't a big problem, you can take them attacking gold mines :P


Title: The Low Point Strategy - discussion
Post by: Foundation on January 20, 2008, 15:05:45 PM
What I meant is that it actually pushes your points down further. Less resources spent = lower points.

Foundation


Title: The Low Point Strategy - discussion
Post by: Radooo on January 20, 2008, 15:17:33 PM
No...it doesn't matter, a fort 7 still brings the same points (or at least this is what I know) ???


Title: The Low Point Strategy - discussion
Post by: k_mihai on January 20, 2008, 15:19:30 PM
radooo is right here


Title: The Low Point Strategy - discussion
Post by: renis on January 20, 2008, 19:57:21 PM
No...it doesn't matter, a fort 7 still brings the same points (or at least this is what I know) ???

Right... networth points for buildings are calculated with the base price.


Title: The Low Point Strategy - discussion
Post by: tangle on January 20, 2008, 20:27:55 PM
No...it doesn't matter, a fort 7 still brings the same points (or at least this is what I know) ???


this is correct you get points based on base price not the price after the bonuses from from uni or arch :-X


Title: The Low Point Strategy - discussion
Post by: Foundation on January 20, 2008, 21:28:19 PM
What! You're serious!..... :(

Foundation


Title: The Low Point Strategy - discussion
Post by: bolin on January 21, 2008, 00:01:02 AM
so your going to tell me that by not having uni or arch im just gonna get like 1 point even though i got level 5 granary level 7 woodd, iron, stone mines. and level 5 barracks etc etc. i believe almost all buildings give you points.


Title: The Low Point Strategy - discussion
Post by: k_mihai on January 21, 2008, 00:04:00 AM
no, we are not


Title: The Low Point Strategy - discussion
Post by: bolin on January 21, 2008, 01:36:53 AM
not you, whoever said that. *bear* hope i could demolish uni and arch to have 1 point


Title: The Low Point Strategy - discussion
Post by: TYhermyte on January 23, 2008, 22:49:07 PM
I am assuming that Bureaucracy 4 should also be purchased ASAP after getting the 2nd Province in place?


Title: The Low Point Strategy - discussion
Post by: k_mihai on January 23, 2008, 23:03:12 PM
yes


Title: The Low Point Strategy - discussion
Post by: TYhermyte on January 25, 2008, 02:20:08 AM
There is no way to destroy a building once it is Build, correct?

The only way to move Population is to build Military units and then Disband them?

When disbanding do you get any Resources back?  Something I saw indicated that maybe you got half?


Title: The Low Point Strategy - discussion
Post by: stud on January 25, 2008, 02:24:29 AM
yes

yes

yes, u get 50% back
 :)



Title: The Low Point Strategy - discussion
Post by: TYhermyte on January 25, 2008, 07:17:54 AM
Excellent.  Having just done this though it appears that the Points from Soldiers that you Disband (or at least Colonize with...) do not go away?   :o

I was at 29 Points, Build 400 more Archers and went up to 56.  I colonized my 2nd Province and the Points are still up.. Resources are all hidden in teh Depots, but I am now over 50 points and not much in the way of an Army.  Did I bif something up?


Title: The Low Point Strategy - discussion
Post by: k_mihai on January 25, 2008, 08:26:03 AM
they don`t disappear :) or, if you want you lose the amount of points when you colonize, then get it back when you have the province.

normal disbanding reduce your points, ofc               


Title: The Low Point Strategy - discussion
Post by: TYhermyte on January 25, 2008, 10:10:34 AM
Ouch.  So I am over 50 points with no going back.  Now I understand why the strategy says to wait three weeks.  Doh!


Title: The Low Point Strategy - discussion
Post by: k_mihai on January 25, 2008, 10:23:46 AM
try to build 800 spears + 200 archers as fast as you can, then attack neighbors.

this is one of the weak spots of the strategy, when one jumps to the second province, because 6-8h the resources are unprotected and one must be lucky until the 2nd province can be colonized. try to keep (in the future) the points at 20.


Title: The Low Point Strategy - discussion
Post by: andy_eu on January 25, 2008, 14:41:46 PM
I am playing with low point strategy for the first time and my biggest problem so far is that Miltary academy lvl 5 can not be researched because centralization 5 must be researched first.


Title: The Low Point Strategy - discussion
Post by: k_mihai on January 25, 2008, 14:43:05 PM
I am playing with low point strategy for the first time and my biggest problem so far is that Miltary academy lvl 5 can not be researched because centralization 5 must be researched first.

yes, i know, is not good. i was forced to use only 4 attack groups when i played low points


Title: The Low Point Strategy - discussion
Post by: Radooo on January 25, 2008, 14:43:35 PM
hehe...i really know that (from last era) :D...and the funny thing is that you need carto 1 for centralization 5 :D...but you will adapt with these small problems :P


Title: The Low Point Strategy - discussion
Post by: andy_eu on January 25, 2008, 14:52:03 PM
I saw that Cartography is needed, I will try to keep it at 0, so I don't press a button by mistake.

...and it is more difficult to play with carto 0, my army is so slow carrying so much gold every time :D


Title: The Low Point Strategy - discussion
Post by: Radooo on January 25, 2008, 14:58:22 PM
but is so nice to play with carto 0 :D


Title: The Low Point Strategy - discussion
Post by: k_mihai on January 25, 2008, 14:59:42 PM
not if you are in a corner :D


andy, you can adapt the strategy, even build centr 5 if you want


Title: Re: The Low Point Strategy - discussion
Post by: Lembitu on January 25, 2008, 20:10:23 PM
I have played low point strategy five eras in a row and its the suitable strategy for my life stile.  I think that people should choose their strategy based on their life style and how much time they can spend behind computer. I have  played 16 hours in a day 4 months and it ruined my summer . :(


Title: Re: The Low Point Strategy - discussion
Post by: renis on January 27, 2008, 00:32:49 AM
I have played low point strategy five eras in a row and its the suitable strategy for my life stile.  I think that people should choose their strategy based on their life style and how much time they can spend behind computer. I have  played 16 hours in a day 4 months and it ruined my summer . :(

 *rose*


Title: Re: The Low Point Strategy - discussion
Post by: allanon on June 12, 2008, 06:29:52 AM
I have played low point strategy five eras in a row and its the suitable strategy for my life stile.  I think that people should choose their strategy based on their life style and how much time they can spend behind computer. I have  played 16 hours in a day 4 months and it ruined my summer . :(

any suggestions on what to do after you've gotten your lvl 7 fort? do you abandon the low point strategy then? or still stop (almost) all research but keep ordering soldiers? hope you can give some advice. thanks :)


Title: Re: The Low Point Strategy - discussion
Post by: pluto on June 22, 2008, 15:05:18 PM
I am new.
Low point strategy sound like an interesting strategy.
I understand that if I am below 50 points, I got newbies protection.
If I am above 50 points, anybody can attack my province, including those have 1000 points and above?


Title: Re: The Low Point Strategy - discussion
Post by: raito on June 22, 2008, 16:48:55 PM
If I am above 50 points, anybody can attack my province, including those have 1000 points and above?
nope.

only people in x2 (double or half your points) without penalties

people in x5 with some penalties


Title: Re: The Low Point Strategy - discussion
Post by: bran360 on June 22, 2008, 18:47:27 PM
well if it gets boring you can always hire some troops and go crazy.


Title: Re: The Low Point Strategy - discussion
Post by: ghostjk on June 26, 2008, 10:55:58 AM
Hmm.. the Low Point model posted in the forum talks about "Hiding resources in Depots" Do these Depots refer to Supply Depots for moving resources, or Imperial Reserves in each individual province? Please do clarify, im a little confused..


Title: Re: The Low Point Strategy - discussion
Post by: Polymeron on June 26, 2008, 21:56:21 PM
The strategy was made before the creation of Imperial Reserves. Back in those days (and still in older version realms), the supply depots would not automatically unload until you had 15,000 points. That means you could use them to hide resources.

With the advent of Imperial Reserves, the strategy needs to be adapted to utilize these, instead.


Title: Re: The Low Point Strategy - discussion
Post by: k_mihai on June 26, 2008, 22:11:21 PM
The strategy was made before the creation of Imperial Reserves. Back in those days (and still in older version realms), the supply depots would not automatically unload until you had 15,000 points. That means you could use them to hide resources.

With the advent of Imperial Reserves, the strategy needs to be adapted to utilize these, instead.

you can store the resources on fort if you are careful :D

but is a strat for 4 realms. the issue is the price of centralization, cause if you play like merry said, you`ll end up as a big farmer with almost the highest points in the realm  *freak*


Title: Re: The Low Point Strategy - discussion
Post by: pluto on June 28, 2008, 17:56:42 PM
nope.

only people in x2 (double or half your points) without penalties

people in x5 with some penalties

I have just sent my army to attack another player which is in x2. But I started a research immediately after that and I found that this player is no longer in x2 range. Any penalties in this case?


Title: Re: The Low Point Strategy - discussion
Post by: Radooo on June 28, 2008, 18:08:23 PM
I have just sent my army to attack another player which is in x2. But I started a research immediately after that and I found that this player is no longer in x2 range. Any penalties in this case?

no


Title: Re: The Low Point Strategy - discussion
Post by: pluto on June 29, 2008, 06:59:58 AM
Thanks Radooo!

I am about to colonize another province.
If I colonize province 3, 7, 9, 13, then my enemy can't attack province 8. Is that true?




Title: Re: The Low Point Strategy - discussion
Post by: makavelis on June 29, 2008, 08:04:56 AM
Thanks Radooo!

I am about to colonize another province.
If I colonize province 3, 7, 9, 13, then my enemy can't attack province 8. Is that true?




it's not true , he can attack province 8 but he will lose 20 moral


Title: Re: The Low Point Strategy - discussion
Post by: pluto on July 02, 2008, 18:02:52 PM
I don't get it. How did colonization help in protecting Province 8?
If to colonize, which province shall I colonize?

I am currently playing in Realm 7. Centralization is very expensive. Is it still worthwhile to colonize surrounding provinces?


Title: Re: The Low Point Strategy - discussion
Post by: allanon on July 03, 2008, 05:51:06 AM
Like makavelis said, if you colonize province 3,7,9,13 then anyone who attacks province 8 will start the attack with 20 less morale, so it gives "protection" to province 8.


Title: Re: The Low Point Strategy - discussion
Post by: pluto on July 04, 2008, 17:39:32 PM
If I only colonize the second province, is there any "protection"?

Is there any difference if I colonize province 1 or province 3?


Title: Re: The Low Point Strategy - discussion
Post by: Radooo on July 04, 2008, 19:05:02 PM
If I only colonize the second province, is there any "protection"?

Is there any difference if I colonize province 1 or province 3?

no


Title: Re: The Low Point Strategy - discussion
Post by: $oro$ on August 07, 2008, 00:53:13 AM
Hi, I´m playing LPS in three realms.
In the V2 one, it goes quite well; but in both with V4 I feel like I´m getting to a dead end...
The price of centralization in V4 is too high and my points will explode...has anybody found a solution for that issue? :s
Thanks in advance.


PD:Excuse my english.  :-[



Title: Re: The Low Point Strategy - discussion
Post by: Decimus on August 07, 2008, 00:55:23 AM
no man..v4 is definitely not for LPS for all era..you certain can "hide" in range...but due to 5x rule... *hihi* must get very carefull at networthexplosion.


Title: Re: The Low Point Strategy - discussion
Post by: $oro$ on August 07, 2008, 03:24:16 AM
Well...I supposed that, but I thought there would be a way to sort that obstacle...


Perhaps I should try two different "hybrid" strategies in both V4 realms...any idea beyond non-boxed fort 5 ?

Colonize one province at a time and grow progressively?
Develope higher levels of fort, fortification and garrison? I mean...concentrate in defense and then explode?

BTW...is it foolish to think that V4 was conceived to avoid LPS? Cos' if that wasn´t the goal, at least it seems as if it was...

Greetings.


Title: Re: The Low Point Strategy - discussion
Post by: Decimus on August 07, 2008, 03:26:32 AM
think about 5x range... *freak* *xxx*
make a quick calculation..and see the range of players that can atack u..
youll get eaten alive..they get daily honour.. *freak*